SigPro question

A

Ahhnuld

New member
:) I am looking to purchase a SigPro 2340. I have seen some old threads from 2 years ago mentioning some quality issues, out of battery jams, and feed failures. Can anyone please share their experiences with this firearm? Also, I would really like to know why you love or hate this particular model.

Thanks!
 
I own the 2009 and it is flawless in terms of functioning. Not a single problem after 1000 rounds.

The advantage over the classic series is the cost (this is a factor from many folks) and ease of maintenence. The Pro is a Sig.

If you buy the 2340 you can add a 9mm barrel later, from I understand or the 357Sig. Three guns in one. You cannot go from the 9mm to the other calibers.
 
Yea but, aside from cost, why would I go with the 9mm SigPro instead of the classic p226? Just curious.
 
SIGPro - the grip is adjustable to different sizes

Weight SigPro 27 oz vs 226 30 oz

You can drop in components to make it either DA/SA or DA only.

I owned a SigPro for about a year. Traded it for a 239, wanted something a little smaller than the SigPro.

If I were buying another handgun I'd probably get the 226, since you can get magazines with 15 round capacity. The SIGPro only has 10 rnd available for civlians, 12 for LEO.

Other than the size it was a great gun, never had a problem in either .40 or .357 SIG.
 
Why SigPro

Hey UMp45,
Cost is not so much a factor in my decision. I happen to be a fan of polymer frames, and I especially like the fact that the slide is stainless as well. I have 3 H&Ks, all polymer and they are by far my first carry weapon. I also have a Beretta 8040 that I like very much, but is a little heavier than then others. Never had a Sig, and if I like this one, will probably pick up a 226 or 229 later on. I also heard that the classic Sigs were more prone to rust.
 
I happen to be a fan of polymer frames
Click to expand...

What makes you like the polymer as opposed to aluminum? Is it the weight and balance difference, or do you think there is some functional advantage?

I also heard that the classic Sigs were more prone to rust.
Click to expand...

I heard that also, but I think it's only true for these Sigs:

1) Sigs with the formed/stamped slide which have the blued finish.

2) Sigs with the initial milled slides which have some "blackening" finish.

Sigs with the new milled slides with the Nitron finish are just fine though. Also, Sigs with the two-tone nickeled slides don't have that problem from what I hear.
 
Polymer question

Weight difference is a definite plus. No worries about corrosion, tends to be a better field weapon in that regard (sweat, rain, dirt). I also tend to trust hotloads in a polymer over an aluminum frame, since there have been cases where cracks occur in all types of makes. Just my preference. As far as performance goes, it makes little difference, I can shoot well with either.
 
The nightmare

Sig pros are SIG Sauers failed attempt to recapture the market that they've lost big time to Glock. You either like or you hate sig pros, there's no middle ground here. :rolleyes: I hate them. They're way too big, feel uncomfortable in my hand, have a modular construction which basically means that most work is performed by an armorer, no prebans available for them, and the trigger pull is not as smooth as on the Classics. YMMV.
 
I didn't like them at first because they felt different in my hand than my other SIGs and they had a few reliability issues in the very beginning. However, as Tecolote posted, most either love them or hate them. I have thought about getting one, but it will have to wait until after I get a couple of USPs.
 
I went the exact opposite route that KAM_Indianapolis took. I had a P239 and couldn't handle the sucky trigger. I sold it and acquired a sigpro 2009. It is great. The trigger is much better in double action, it fits my hand like a glove, and it is very accurate. I don't have any regrets. And they corrected that bass-ackward slide release-decocker situation on the sigpros. On the sigpro the slide release is right where your thumb naturally falls instead of the decocker. I like my 2009 so much I think I will acquire a 2340 as soon as I locate the bucks.
 
Last edited:
I've had a Sig/Pro 2340 for about 1 yr. Just had it to range yesterday for 200 rds. beautiful gun, excellant quality, easy to field strip for cleaning, have about 2500 rds. tot. so far. I just can't seem to shoot it accurately, then again, I also have 3 Kimbers, totally different triggers. so maybe I need more practice.
 
Barrels, I believe Bar-sto has them. I bought mine off cheaper than dirt.

Funny, I shot better with the 239, than I did with the SigPro. So did my brother-in-law. Liked the trigger on the 239 better than the SigPro as well. Yet another case of YMMV. :D

Anyway, liked the SIGPro enough to replace it with another SIG. The SIGPro just didn't seem to conceal as well as my other pistols, which was the main reason for me switching. May have been due to several factors, including it's relative bulk, and the holster (dont ask me who made it, don't remember.)
 
There is nothing wrong with a sigpro.
I've got a 2340 with a .40 and .357sig barrel and its awesome.
If you live in a state where you can't have full capacity magazines buying a p226 or p228 for more capacity isn't a concern.
The trigger pull on the DA is even lighter than my sig classic pistol.
I can't really complain about my 2340.
It also has an accessorie rail to add lights,lazers and stuff.
You can't go wrong with any sig. I got mine for $459 so it was a steal. I suggest you shop around.
 
Sig Pros have steel rails, made of what looks like 8 or 9 gauge stainless steel, hydraulic press formed. So they should last a long time.

I love my 2340 but my wife dislikes it because she prefers the lower recoil of a 9mm.

It has never misfired, more than I can say for any 1911 I've ever shot.
 
The test articles I read upon the Pro's intro suggested the accuaracy was down from the classic.

The grips seem bigger to me.

To correct some bad info stated earlier:

"And they corrected that bass-ackward slide release-decocker situation on the sigpros."
It's exactly the same lever arrangement as the classic. It just looks different. The decock is still in front of the release.

"Weight SigPro 27 oz vs 226 30 oz."
While this is true, the Pro model is the size and barrel length of the 228, which is also right at 27 oz.

There is no weight or ergonomic advantage with the Pro. They seem to be less accurate and aren't any cheaper than the recently imported 225's that are selling for $500 alot of places. I'd look to HK for a similar plastic frame weapon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top