Sig owners...Do you prefer Siglites or the standard "Dot the I" sights ??

Not that any of you NEED or WANT me to illustrate what I see when I shoot, but here it is anyway :)

Because I'm far-sighted, I see one target, two fuzzy pistols. I have trained myself, with both eyes open, to use the "right" pistol, which is the one my left eye sees (I'm also left handed) and ignore the "left" pistol, which is farther away from my body in appearance, and seen with the right eye. But which would be easier for you to decipher quickly...

i i or ......
 
Would anyone mind posting a picture of a sig with SIGLites and a picture of a sig with standard "Dot the I" sights? Thanks.
 
Put another 175rnds thru my new 220 today...The Siglites are still hard to pick up but did seem a little better then last time...I guess it just takes some time...
 
Rear notch and plain front blade for target work

Bar & dot for combat use

Three dot as a compromise for both

Ashley Express standard size big dot Tritium, supremo combat sights, nothing quicker.

YMMV

Mike H
 
Sights

After trying the 3 dot system that came with my HK, Keltec, and comparing with the Kahr dot the i, the i system is better for a reason. When I acquire a target and focus on the target(scumbag) I use my peripheral (although fuzzy) vision to see the sights. This allows me to maintain focus on target w/out aligning a horizontal ( 3 dot system) when I am instinctively moving the firearm in a vertical movement, hence the quicker acquisiton with a dot the i system. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top