Should one's first handgun be a carry gun or a range gun?

I tend to take people at their word so no didn’t get any subliminal meaning, just confusion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Whatever. Nit-Pickery notwithstanding, a gun similar in size/dimensions to a Glock 19/S&W M&PC/etc. hopefully the OP is capable of making that enormous intuitive leap.
 
You mentioned....

.....the Ruger SP101. With the three inch barrel, that would serve both purposes well. Or a used Hi Power clone ( I say clone because most Browning Hi Powers might be out of reach of a college students finances) . With the slim slide, it carries surprisingly well IWB. I carry a Ruger Speed Six as well.
 
I would go full-sized before I went CC. At roughly the same age, 22 or so, I got a 4" 357. Not long after I got a 9mm High Power. A snub 38 and a Makarov, both intended for carry, came a year or two down the road.
 
Start with a .22

Let's all reach back deep in our memory banks, back to the first time we fired a handgun.
Mostly the first reaction is, why is there not a hole in the target? Because you not only missed the bull, you missed the entire target.

OK OK a little hyperbole. It takes time and effort to shoot a handgun well. There is no cheaper way to do that than good ol .22

Heck a Heritage Rough Rider .22 only is only 100 bucks or thereabouts. Not pretty but all reports indicate decent accuracy.

Start there.
 
"...a carry gun or a range gun..." Those are the same thing. You should practice with whatever you carry, using the ammo you use when carrying.
Click to expand...

This is true but I think we're dealing with the added dimension of it being a first handgun. That's why we have so many good recommendations to look for what Spats called a "Goldilocks gun".


Most schools don't allow firearms on campus though.
Click to expand...

This is worth considering. In addition to some more sage advice from Spats that "colleges are a breeding ground for for over-consumption of alcohol, theft, and bad decisions", there are legal considerations. Different states have different laws and different colleges have different policies. However much anyone even remotely educated on this issue understands that banning defensive weapons can get people hurt or killed, you're still subject to the law and you need to know what that is.
 
I may get a little flak for this But I don’t think your first handgun should be a compact sized gun that you immediately start stuffing into your pants.
Click to expand...

OK, here's some flak (37mm, not 88 :rolleyes:)

If you are going to be "stuffing a Glock into your pants", I suggest you use FMJ ... That way, when you shoot yourself in the testicles, you will at least be using "ball ammo". :D:rolleyes::p:eek:

and another thing, if you DO stuff a Glock, or any of the clones that don't have a positive safety lever (lock) into your pants, if it slips and starts to fall, DON'T GRAB IT!!!!!!

Holsterless carry (aka "Mexican carry") of a Glock or any thing similar is a stupidly dangerous thing to do. And recommending it to a beginner is VERY poor advice.

Should one's first handgun be a range gun or a carry gun??

Range gun. And NOT one of the compact or subcompact semi autos or a snub nose revolver.

And, it should be a .22. Especially if you are on a tight budget. Something in the "sport pistol" class, with decent sights and a fair trigger. Something big enough to easily handle and shoot. Because your first handgun is a training tool, more than anything else.

My life was different from yours. The first pistol I actually bought was a .45ACP. BUT, I grew up in a family who had, and used guns. Dad was and NRA safety instructor, and by the time I bought my first pistol, I had nearly a decade's worth of practice and instruction on and with Mom & Dad's pistols. And yes, I absolutely started with a .22.

First thing is LEARN TO SHOOT well, and how to safely handle the pistol. Everything else comes later.

The only way to get good at shooting is to shoot. And shoot properly, not just bang off rounds in the general direction of the target. That takes practice, PROPER practice, and that takes ammo which means cost. 9mm is "Cheap" but only in comparison to other centerfire rounds.

.22LR is the cheapest (lowest cost) ammo there is. You get more practice for less cost with a .22 than any other cartridge firearm.

Simply put, you need to learn how to drive before you go out into big city traffic.

Like driving, carrying a handgun has two major parts. The first, is the mechanical aptitude and skill to operate the "vehicle" (learning to shoot and safely handle the gun) the second is more complex, its the "traffic laws" and the "rules of the road", and is an entirely different matter than just being physically capable of driving.

Start with learning to shoot, and for that, nothing is as good as a .22. The rest can come later.

Now, there is a school of thought that says you should just go out and get the gun you will wind up carrying, and learn to use it. There is some merit to that line of thought.

HOWEVER, doing that makes the learning curve steeper than necessary, and more expensive (ammo costs), and it also assumes you KNOW what you will wind up carrying to begin with.

Lots of us knew what we wanted, and what we were going to do, when we were beginners. Then, as we learned things (by doing - shooting etc) some of us learned how much we didn't know.

And, we also learned that what was right for someone else might not be the best thing for us. Get some personal shooting experience, to base your opinions on. You might learn something that changes your choices.
 
If you are going to have one gun for both tasks, what you can reliably and comfortably carry is the limiting factor. So think about it. How will you carry? What is the weather like where you live? What kind of job do you have? How do you dress? What are the laws?

I'm guessing open carry is out. If conditions are right for vertical shoulder carry, the only thing limiting your choice in polymer-framed semi-autos is what hides alongside your personal frame. (Having done a lot of all-day shoulder carry, trust me on the polymer recommendation.) I've seen guys pack all sorts of things IWB but I find that a little more limiting. Guns like the PPS and Shield are decently comfortable for me inside the waistband. I've never tried ankle or appendix carry. The biggest thing I can comfortably carry in a pocket holster is the LCR.

Where do you think you'd be on the spectrum?
 
Your "carry gun" should also be your "range gun" for obvious reasons.

Things I hate on internet gun commentary;

"range toy"
"entry level"
 
My carry guns aren't fun range guns too? WOW that never entered my mind. Guess I'll just have to leave them at home on in their holsters when I go to the range to do some shooting from now on.:rolleyes:
 
Should one's first handgun be a carry gun or a range gun?

Like I've said on here before, my only gun experience as of now is with a .22 revolver and a couple of bolt-action rifles.

I'm turning 21 soon and looking for a first handgun

The two purposes I'd consider in a first handgun would be:

A) A large, harder-to-carry handgun for range fun, possible home defense and occasional carry if I'm going to a certain place I'm unfamiliar with. I'm thinking a 3 to 6 inch .357 Magnum (Model 19/686, GP100) or "compact" to full size pistol like a used Beretta 92 compact or third generation Glock 19.

B) A small, concealed carry gun. Either a single stack 9 (Shield) or a .38 snub (642, SP101, something used maybe).

Even if I go with option A, I'll probably go for option B later once my life settles down a bit and vice versa. So for now, which sounds like a better investment?
Click to expand...

I would go with one of your "A" choices for a first handgun. Learning to shoot a handgun well should be your first priority. A handgun with good sights and trigger like the 357s mentioned above is what I would go with. And they allow a wide range of ammo power levels to be used. A 686 is what I picked as my first handgun some 30+ years ago.

To the "B" list I have a couple of Shields and the 642. The 642 for a beginner will undoubtedly be one of the most difficult handguns to learn to shoot well with. The Shields have a more of a hand filling grip, far better sights and a decent trigger.
 
I'd say just go for the shield you mentioned. You can get the 2.0 model for around $310-320ish. Small enough to carry, easy enough to shoot at the range. Also has an extended magazine for the range or home defense. If it fits your hand good, go for it.
 
CCW HD, etc.

See if you can borrow a buddy's CCW along with the holster and walk around with for a few hours every day. Let us know how many times your pants fall down.

There are so many considerations and most of the advice here is spot on regarding handgun size. Small pocket guns are very difficult to master; 9mm ammo cost more than .22LR ammo.

Starting with a 22 will afford you the opportunity for more practice and familiarity with a handgun.

After becoming proficient with your .22 then move up to something like a Colt Commander or a Walther PPQ or similar weapons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top