Should I buy a Ruger MK II ??????

L

Larz

New member
I am fairly new to pistols. I love shooting them but centerfire ammo is burning a hole in my pocket. I want to get a 22lr pistol that is extremely accurate yet affordable. I am seriously looking at the MK II in SS with a 6 7/8 in barrell. Do any of you own this gun and how accurate is it. I would like to use it for squirl and rabit hunting along with some accurate plinking.

Also I was considering getting the 10.5 inch model but I don't really know if it will be that much more accurate. Plus I don't think I want to carry a pistol that long in the woods.

Thanks ahead of time for the input, Josh

Also... if you have any other 22lr autos to suggest I would like to hear your suggestions. Thanks a lot
 
I've had a MKII with a 6.75" barrel (Government model) and I much prefer the 5.5" length that I have now. I've hunted squirrel with mine and it works well. The Ruger MKII is extremely reliable and accurate. I would like the 22/45 better and will likely buy a 4" BB target soon.
 
Hi-Cap: what is it about the 22/45 that you like better over the MKII(assuming all things being equal such as barrel length, sights, and BB)?

Andy
 
Hey Larz, I own the Ruger MK II KMK-512; that's the 51/2" bull barrel model in
stainless steel; it's a great shooter
and very inexpensive to play with. The
gun will out shoot the shooter's abilities
in most case's> :D

Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
 
Larz,
Notice you are in Elyria, Ohio. Check out Sandtone Fur in Amherst. They have a good deal on the Browning Buckmark Camper. I picked one up for $199.00 2 weeks ago. The Ruger Mark II is a decent gun, accurate and reliable. The 22/45 has a little better trigger, due I believe (just my opinion here)to the polymer frame being just a bit slipperyier than the metal frame of the Mark II, where the trigger linkage rubs against the frame. Also the 22/45 has a straight grip that I find more comfortable than the angled grip of the Mark II. My scoped Mark II will shoot half dollar sized 100 shot groups at 50 yards, and dime sized groups at 25 yards, from a casual rest( just laying the barrel on top of something solid), plenty accurate enough for small game.

The only sub $250.00 semi auto I would avoid is the Smith and Wesson 22a/22s. Not only for the obvious, but from what I have read, and based on my own experience with mine, they don't hold up that well.

Just about all .22 semi autos are extremely accurate these days. The main thing that drives the cost up is the trigger pull, and the design of the trigger mechanism. The main difference between a $300.00 Ruger and a $700.00 Smith and Wesson model 41 is in the trigger. Even with $400.00 work, the Ruger will not be able to match the 41 in the trigger department.(I was told this by a gun smith, even though it cost him $$$ to say it)

The SIG trailside, which is somewhat new to these shores, is also a mid range ($400 to $500)option.

If you want to try one( Buckmark, Ruger Mark II, Smith 22s, or even a Ciener conversion on a Kimber)let me know, I'm about 45 min from Elyria.
 
I second what Ala Dan had to say on the KMK-512 it is an excellent relaible target / squirrel gun.

I also have a 15 yr old MKII in blue with the 4" tapper barrel and fixed sites.

The old blue gun was re-released as the 50th anniversay commerative this past year The 4" tapper version has a balance and feel to it that is way beyond any of the heavy bull barrel models.

I can shoot the blue fixed site MKII as well and sometimes better than the KMK-512 with a bull barrel and adjustable sites.

Mark II's are fine guns and after you have cleaned them a few times you will have no problem with reassembly.

Unlike the S&W guns and the Brownings you dont have samll seemingly flimsey parts or allen keys, or screws (under the rear site??? on a buckmark) only large robust parts.



[This message has been edited by Master Blaster (edited April 01, 2000).]
 
MB,
You said "Unlike the S&W guns and the Brownings you dont have samll seemingly flimsey parts or allen keys, or screws (under the rear site??? on a buckmark) only large robust parts."

I agree that the S&W 22a/22s is inferior in quality and construction. The Buckmark does have 2 serious gotcha's in the screws and the recoil spring retainer. Ruger also has a couple of areas where care should be taken in regards to disassembly. Under the firing pin, there is a small spring and a metal piece. Care should be taken that the firing pin block pin doesn't become loose and allow these parts to drop free and be lost. The safety detent ball and spring also require three hands to put together if you take a Ruger down far enough. The pins that hold the guts together are also one way taper, and can fit the *wrong way* if forced.
 
I would recommend a Ruger. I have a 10 1/2 bull barrel and like it alot :) It is accurate,though I have not shot it in a while.
The only thing I don't like about them is the way they strip down for cleaning,always gives me problems. But overall it is a good pistol :)
Hope this helps :)

Happy Shooting :)

------------------
We preserve our freedoms by using four boxes: soap,ballot,jury, and cartridge.
Anonymous
 
Just picked up my new MK II 5.5in bull barrel yesterday. Mounted a new PDP 5 and had at it. I love this pistol. It is truly a blast. Planning on using it for PPC shoots. Besides ammo is so cheap, 500rds for $8. The 5.5 is the perfect length, the longer ones just didnt feel right.

Be Safe
Mike
 
The Ruger is an excellent choice. I had a MK512 5.5" bull barrel and was very pleased with it. Well built and accurate. 22/45 is real nice too. When I recently went shopping for another .22 auto I ended up with a Browning Buckmark Micro Plus in satin nickle/ satin black two tone. Boy is it pretty! :) I like the controls more than the Rugers and it shoots every bit as well as the Ruger and a bit better than my Buckmark standard did. Field stripping a gun by having to remove 2 screws has never seemed like a huge inconvenience to me and although folks don`t like the idea of removing the rear sight base to clean the gun I`ve found that tapered screws keep the sight zeroed everytime anyway so it`s really a moot point. It`s a matter of personal preference you can`t go wrong with either one and if you have your heart set on a Ruger MKII,get it, you won`t be sorry. Marcus
 
Andy socal, different from the MKII, I like the plastic frame of the 22/45 and the grip angle (same as a 1911), and I like that the magazine release is in the 1911 position rather than at the bottom of the mag well.
 
The Ruger Mk IIs are fine guns, reasonably priced, very reliable. You should check out the new SIG Trailside which is getting excellent reviews. Available in 4.5" or 6" barrels, standard or target models. The 6" Target is my next pistol.
 
Yes. Get it in 5.5".

My personal .22 pistol is a Browing Buckmark, which I hold in the highest esteem, but the Mk II would be my second choice. Love 'em both.

M.G./L.P.
 
Larz,
I have the MK-II standard 4in barrel. It is a very accurate pistol for general plinking,or hunting, although, I have not tried it.(I do not hunt.)
Can you use a pistol for rabbit, or squirrel hunting in Ohio? I would check into this before you try to hunt with your new baby. I would hate to find out that you had your new gun confiscated by the Ohio Gestapo, and are communicating with us from the county jail library.


------------------
BOYCOTT SMITH AND WESSON!!!
Defend the Constitution from the foreign threat!!!!
 
I have owned a Ruger MK II w/ the 5 1/2" bull barrel model in stainless steel for years myself, and it is a fantastic pistol. Very accurate, and fun to shoot. The trigger can be a bit stiff, but at least the travel is quite short.

Recently I have had the desire to change the grip, so I started a new topic. Anyone w/ any thoughts, please chime in.

It's a great pistol.
 
Dad gave me one for Christmas 15-20 years ago (5.5in bull barrel). I wanted a Single-Six but got the auto instead. I'm glad dad made that little mistake. It's a fine pistol. If you are going to get a .22 you won't go wrong with the Ruger.

Jack
 
I have the 6 7/8 bbl s/s Govt. Model and it's accurate enough for me and then some. Came with scope mount and rings for a 1" scope so I picked up a 2X Tasco for $70.

You won't regret picking up one of these pistols.
 
I believe that some of the older Rugers mentioned in the posts above might be Mark I’s instead of Mark II’s. Anyone know what year they came out with the Mark II?

I have several of each and they are certainly fine pistols.

Skyhawk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top