Should I buy a 22

hube1236

New member
Should I buy a .22? Will it really help me to be more profiscient with my intended carry piece? Or should I take the money and buy my carry caliber cartridges and practice with those?

I know more guns, more fun, but...

[This message has been edited by hube1236 (edited August 29, 2000).]
 
It would depend on what you're out to shoot. I have an old S&W .22 that is EXACTLY like a .38 model that I have that indeed helped me shoot the .38 better in the long run.

All in all, I would by a .22 regardless. It'll be fun and cheap to shoot with, and provide endless entertainment for yourself and any other newbies you wish to introduce to shooting.

------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!

oberkommando sez:
"We lost the first and third and now they are after the Second!(no pun intended)"
 
Everyone who is serious about shooting should invest in a decent .22. Whether you shoot only pistol, or rifle. I found that shooting a .22 RF in a similar style firearm does wonders to improve how well you do with the bigger gun.

No doubt about it get a .22!

Take Care,

Rob
 
Yes! They're great fun, economical, and no matter how dissimilar it may be from your regular carry piece, it'll still help with your marksmanship. (Did I mention how much fun they are? Oh, and cheap! Did I mention that?)

------------------
"...and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."
Luke 22:36
"An armed society is a polite society."
Robert Heinlein
"Power corrupts. Absolute power - is kinda cool!"
Fred Reed
 
Don't get caught up in buying a .22 that's like your carry piece. Fact is, a Mk2 or such is great shooting fun and will help you learn trigger control and sight/target acquisition even though it is totally dissimilar to that Sig in your belt.

Considering how cheap they are to shoot and how good they are for beginners, I highly recommend the .22, rifle or pistol.

Set up some cans and go to it.

------------------
When Reason Fails.....
 
Yes.

The .22 is a funny thing. You may think of it as a beginner's gun or as a pop-gun not worthy of a "real shootist". Then you get it out of the box and look it over. You realize you get 5X as much ammo for the same amount of $$$, you take it to the range a few times and pretty soon it goes with you every time. Next thing you know its your favorite plinker and you're hooked.

Of course, the real advantage of the .22 is that you can practice trigger control very inexpensively. Regardless of caliber, trigger control remains the same.
 
To answer the original question - absolutely. Since you didn't have one when you were young, you need to get it real soon 'cause you have a lot of catching up to do. :)

You need a pistol or revolver, your choice, and a rifle. Now git going!
 
Yes!!!!! a pistol and a rifle!!!!

------------------
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the United States
 
Sight picture and trigger squeeze. It doesn't matter if it's a .22 or more, the sight picture and trigger suqeeze are the keys. FWIW, I shoot thousands of rounds of .22 by choice instead of the center fires. Among the less obvious reasons are: You don't have to concern yourself in chasing brass-a huge distraction from shooting, the smaller holes made by a .22 are less of a distraction when shooting at a dark target-less chance to look *beyond* the front sight and admire your handiwork(or lack of) during shooting,Less noise-I find I can get by using ear plugs rather than muffs w/.22's-far less fatigue during long sessions.
As far as pistol vs revolver goes-A new revolver is going to set you back plenty, somewhere around $350.00 to $450.00 for a good D/A. Ruger offers their SP101 D/A in .22 lr, but they are hard to find. Most decent pistols are half that amount. Top choices for inexpensive yet outstandingly accurate are , Ruger 22/45, Browning Buckmark Camper-in the $190.00 to $230.00 range. The Buckmark standard and Micro add another $30.00 to $50.00 to that price, along with the Ruger Mark II line, for the $230.00 to $300.00 range. A .22 conversion unit for the 1911, Glock and Beretta can be had from J.A. Ciener- www.22lrconversions.com for $200.00 to $250.00, depending on which model. The main difference is in the sights. Another possibility is a CZ 75B in .40SW or .9mm with the Kadet .22 lr conversion unit. Any of the above will offer decent sights, good out of box trigger-as good as most stock centerfires- and accuracy that is better than 99% of anyone can shoot.
FWIW, my favorite of the bunch is the 22/45. It's inexpensive, impossible to wear out, has the same sight picture as my Browning Hi Power, and is accurate enough to put a scare into empty 12 ga shells at 50 yards on one of my good days. Second would be the Buckmark Camper. The Camper is a basic Buckmark, with a rougher finish and a bull barrel. It is well worth the savings over the standard model for a knock about type of gun, yet still has the same comfortable grip of the standard model.
That touches briefly on the handguns, in a rifle, just about anything you can get in a centerfire, you can get in a rimfire. My personal favorites are the Winchester Lever and te Marlin Model 60 in an auto. If you don't care for a tube fed, then Ruger offers a magazine fed auto, as well as a lever action. Remington also has a good auto in the 597 line, but it looks a little *chunky* for my tastes, YMMV. The autos and the bolt actions can give outstanding accuracy out to 100 yards, while the Lever actions are less accruate but a lot of fun nonetheless.
Don't delude yourself, shooting a .22 is more of a challange that you might think. Putting tiny holes close together is a lot harder than putting big holes close together. One of the strangest things I've run across on theinternet is a sport called "Bottle Cap Shoots", where .22's are used at 100 yards. the winner is the one to hit the greast number of milk bottle sized targets, closets to the center. The difference between 1st and last place is measured in tens of thousandsth of an inch!
Have fun, .22's are great. Everyone should own a bunch of them.
 
Hube, Heck yes! A revolver or two, several semi pistols, at least one conversion for your 1911's and four or five informal rifles. Then get a couple of serious rifles and you should be about done!
 
I've posted a thread in the handgun forum which discusses the merits of a .22 for training and practice. You'll have to do a search to find it since it was months ago when it was posted.
 
It's a gun, right? You don't have one, right? OF COURSE you buy it. DUH!

------------------
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club
68-70
true story, a Union Gen. once said "Don't worry about those Rebs. They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist..SPLAT.
 
What more can be said?

Get a nice double action revolver, a single action revolver, a pistol, a bolt rifle, one that's semi-auto & don't forget a pump long gun. T/C makes a pretty dandy in a single shot that'll morph to both - short & long.

.22s're just too handy, nifty, cheap to shoot, versatile & fun not to have several.

We've only got seven or so .22s in different configs & I figure we still need double that.
 
YES--you definitely need a .22. A Ruger 22/45 and a 10/22 will at least get you started, and for less than $500 total. It will be money well spent.

freedomlover

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis
 
Of course buy it! Buy a couple!!!!
I have so much fun with my .22 rifles and pistols!!!!!!!

------------------
"Any world that I'm welcome to.....Is better than the one I come from"
 
Back
Top