ImprobableJoe
Moderator
Where is the good in committing murder?
But if a person does break and accomplishes what is in my mind a good thing, then I see no reason to keep them from what I consider immoral punishment if I have it in my power do so.
Do you think if the pharmacist came back with an AR or a Tac shotgun and fired five rounds into the guy - would take look worse in court than the 380 already did. Would it change the mind of those who were on the fence?
Hey, whatever floats your boat. Like I said, I'd acquit him no matter what.
Where is the good in committing murder?
Vigilantism is no better. It's anarchy in a civil society. If you don't like the law, then use your rights as a citizen and seek to change the law.
It really doesn't matter if Parker was moving, twitching, speaking or not. The Castle Defense doesn't allow you to continue to use deadly force on an incapacitated suspect.
However, jury nullification is an accepted and legal way of refusing to be used by government in order to enforce punishment for a law one believes to be immoral.
I just think there is a lot of room here for reasonable doubt.