Given the impressive simplicity of the design, I don't understand why they made it as tall as it is.
I think the SeeAll will require a pistol like focus -- either the sight or the target but not both. One doesn't look through a SeeAll; one looks at it.
The one i messed with was on a handgun & it was tricky to align the 2 images as they kept wandering out of the "window" that gives the effect of superimposition.
Yes that was how I checked the one I saw at the gun show. The rear is actually a lens which "fakes" the sight being further away to the eye than it really is. Its a different way of putting the sight image & target in the same plane.You are wrong about not looking through the see all, you do look through it.
Exactly my point, the big selling point was that you supposedly do not need to align sights, but you do, just like iron sights.That is absolutely no different than not being able to line up the front and rear iron sights.
A single-element lens automatically centers the crosshair recticle with the gun’s point of impact. No more eye confusion and parallax between target, front post and rear notch. Just raise your gun, pick up your target and shoot.
Quote:
That is absolutely no different than not being able to line up the front and rear iron sights.
Quote:Exactly my point, the big selling point was that you supposedly do not need to align sights, but you do, just like iron sights.
Grizz12 said:You are wrong about not looking through the see all, you do look through it.
shoot with both eyes open and on the target.
You're actually faking out the eyeball to do both at once!What you are describing is not looking through the sight, i.e. focusing on an object on the other side of and beyond the sight. The SeeAll necessarily obstructs everything behind it.
wp said:Think of it as the opposite of a magnifying glass...