Scumbag Dems "boo" Boy Scouts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jack 99

New member
I told you there was no bottom for these Bolsheviks. No act too low, too despicable, or too disgusting for them, they'll happily sink to any low to further "the cause."

In addition to spitting on the police honor guard (parading the flag, no less) in Buffalo, this is just another example of how the Dems really feel about truth and honor and tradition.
http://208.246.212.80/election2000/default-20008172390.htm

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Democratic delegates boo
the Boy Scouts of America

By Valerie Richardson
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


LOS ANGELES — When Gloria Johnson learned that a
group of Eagle Scouts was about to take the stage at the
Democratic National Convention, she immediately went into
action.
She and other California delegates grabbed poster board
and markers and made signs that read, "We Support Gay Boy
Scouts." As the uniformed Scouts took part in the opening
ceremony, the delegates, seated in the front of the hall, waved
their signs — and booed.
Under normal circumstances, jeering at children is the sort
of behavior that might get a delegate sanctioned, if not booted
from the convention altogether. But anyone who expected the
Democratic leadership to scold the Boy Scouts of America
bashers is attending the wrong convention.
Support for homosexual rights has become an integral part
of the Democratic orthodoxy, as unassailable as the party's
pro-choice or civil rights planks. Since the Supreme Court ruled
that the Boy Scouts can ban homosexual leaders, the
Democrats have sided squarely with homosexuals in
condemning the decision.
Indeed, Democratic National Committee spokesman Rick
Hess was careful to avoid criticizing either the Boy Scouts or
the delegates, instead stressing that the party is staunchly
committed to homosexual rights.
Most Democrats support the work the Boy Scouts do,"
said Mr. Hess. "At the same time, we want to see gays and
lesbians treated with respect. Democrats across the board
support equal rights for gays and lesbians and we want to
make sure they're not discriminated against."
The Boy Scouts, meanwhile, were shocked by the negative
reception. The Los Angeles Council of Boy Scouts sent a
half-dozen Eagle Scouts and an adult leader to the event at the
request of Democratic organizers, said council spokesman
Joey Robinson.
"I think whatever the national policy is, the kids don't set
the policy. When you boo the policy, you're booing the kids,"
said Mr. Robinson.
Fortunately, he said, the Staples Center was so noisy
during the Tuesday night ceremony that none of the boys heard
the booing, although the adult leader did.
Delegates who participated in protesting the Boy Scouts
yesterday said they had nothing against the boys, but wanted to
send a message to the Democratic Party for inviting the
Scouts.
"Of course, we're not against the kids — it isn't about
them," said California delegate Craig Christensen. "But there
were groups that could have been picked that haven't been so
blatantly discriminatory. . . . It was a thoughtless thing to do."
Alex Mallonee, a California delegate who didn't participate
in the demonstration, said he sympathized with the homosexual
delegates.
"I think it was odd that they had the Boy Scouts up there,
given the situation," he said. "It was pretty insensitive."
This year's convention has almost twice as many
homosexual delegates as the 1996 gathering, thanks to
recruiting efforts by the national party. Mr. Christensen said
there are 212 openly homosexual delegates at this year's
convention, up from 125 four years ago.
Delegates give credit to the DNC, which instructed state
parties to work on making their delegations reflect their states'
minority composition. For many states, that meant setting
"targets," which are different from quotas, Democrats insisted.
When states submit their delegation plans, the DNC asks
them to have their delegations look as much like their voters as
possible," said Mr. Hess. "This is wholly different from quotas
— this is Colin Powell-type recruitment."
In California, that meant setting "targets" of 5 percent
homosexual men and 5 percent homosexual women. The
California delegation ended up with 34 openly homosexual
delegates, the largest concentration of any state.
Delegate Jeri Dilno said the state party would have
appointed homosexual delegates if the caucuses fell short of
those goals. "A friend of mine was appointed that way the last
time [in 1996]," she said.
The Georgia delegation also set a goal of 5 percent and
met it by electing five openly homosexual delegates out of 105,
said delegate Annette Hatton.
Wisconsin delegate Jane Fee, 73, who was born a man but
has been taking female hormones and dressing like a woman
for the past dozen years, said he "came as part of the female
quota." But since he never had a sex-change operation, he
acknowledged he fulfills the Democratic sex quotas all by
himself.
"Actually, the diversity that we show in the Democratic
Party, whether it's by quota or not, indicates that we really are
interested in having all of America represented by the party,"
said Mr. Fee, a father and grandfather who used to be known
as James.
As for the Boy Scouts, Miss Hatton added that she never
heard any booing during the ceremony, although other
delegates and news accounts reported booing.
Michael Perez, chairman of the National Stonewall
Democratic Federation, called the protesters "very supportive
of the kids."
"We're 100 percent behind the kids," said Mr. Perez. "We
don't agree with what their establishment came up with. There
are gay Boy Scouts out there, and we want them to know we
support them."
Rep. Jennifer Dunn, Washington Republican, didn't see it
that way. "The Boy Scouts are revered by most people," she
said. "It's the kind of thing that reflects badly on the
Democratic Party."
• Bill Sammon contributed to this report.
 
It pains me to see these misguided young men wasting their youth in the boy Scouts when they could be putting their time to better use such as by practicing homosexualilty.
Why I’ll bet some of these delinquents even have girl friends.
Can’t blame the Democrats for not wanting that sort of riff raff at their convention.

Now we need “goals” (not to be confused with quotas) to make sure we have enough of these perverts in our government?
Where is this going to end?
Am I losing my F*****g mind? :eek:
 
Such bad taste...

Very fitting the convention is in LA...

Now quick! Lets block all the roads leading out of California and enforce a NO FLY ZONE!
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>"Of course, we're not against the kids — it isn't about
them," said California delegate Craig Christensen.[/quote]

Now its NOT about the childern? Give me and them a break!
anodes.
 
What can I say ( that won't get me arrested ) other then if they called for a national molestation day I would not be surprised in the least.
 
Could you imagine what those Democrats might have done had they realized that the Boy Scouts still have Riflery and Shotgun merit badges?

------------------
Beware the man with the S&W .357 Mag.
Chances are he knows how to use it.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bottom Gun:
It pains me to see these misguided young men wasting their youth in the boy Scouts when they could be putting their time to better use such as by practicing homosexualilty.
Why I’ll bet some of these delinquents even have girl friends.
Can’t blame the Democrats for not wanting that sort of riff raff at their convention.

Now we need “goals” (not to be confused with quotas) to make sure we have enough of these perverts in our government?
Where is this going to end?
Am I losing my F*****g mind? :eek:
[/quote]

Not to mention some of these boys actually target shoot AND some of the more misguided have the nerve to go hunting with their dads and uncles and other responsable adults . When will the debauchery end ?
I guess they now must help little old MEN across the streets just to show their diversity . CRAPOLA!!!!!!



------------------
TOM
SASS AMERICAN LEGION NRA GOA
 
As a proud Eagle Scout since 1967 myself, I was OUTRAGED!!! about this incident. Had I been there as a chaperone, I'd have gone into the group and demanded an apology and probably gotten tossed to the demonstrators outside! I wonder if I pranced around in front of Klinton on Monday night when he was speaking with a sign that said he was a degenerate if I'd have attracted attention??

My personal letter is already in the mail to the National Eagle Scout Association encouraging them to demand a public apology from the California delegates and their chairwoman. In addition, I strongly suggested that the NESA alert Mr. Lieberman's office about this incident and demand some attention from him. Gore would be a waste of time. Finally I also suggested that they issue a national press release outlining their intentions to pursue an apology. The BSA has been dragged through the wringer all the way up to the Supreme Court. They won. Now it's time for a little payback. I sincerely hope that the NESA and BSA seriously take my suggestion to heart. I can't believe that these "adults" could stoop so low as to hassle a Boy Scout and Eagle Boy Scouts at that!!!!

I'm pissed! Does it show?

Rome
 
Well, let's think about this for a second.

What if you were at some kind of convention or other, and a group of "Kids Against Nasty Guns" took the stage? What would you do? Most importantly, would you deride those who *did* boo just as you do these folks?

Now, I'll admit that these delegates were being ignorant and self-defeating. But I don't know if they've violated some sacred law of political discourse.
 
More importantly, can't we disapprove of shameful Democrat tactics without the need to refer to gay people as perverts or imply that they're child molesters? Some of us have friends who think shooters are freaks, too, and it's hard enough to explain to them without having to explain gay-bashing among my other friends.
I'm not calling for censorship. I'm saying that taste, decorum, and common sense dictate that you keep this kind of opinion to yourself when speaking in "public" or especially in someone else's private home. TFL is both.
 
Also read in today's paper that United Way is pulling it's financial support to the Boy Scouts because of their position on gay scout leaders. I will be pulling my financial support to United Way on Monday and will let them know why! :mad:
 
I have a better idea than all of you. How about the National Scout organization put out a press release say that due to the attitude of the DNC the scouts would no longer provide any type of color guard for ANY Democratic party gathering. That would label them in public as being someone the Boy Scouts do not want to associate with.

;)
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mort:
Well, let's think about this for a second.

What if you were at some kind of convention or other, and a group of "Kids Against Nasty Guns" took the stage? What would you do? Most importantly, would you deride those who *did* boo just as you do these folks?

Now, I'll admit that these delegates were being ignorant and self-defeating. But I don't know if they've violated some sacred law of political discourse.
[/quote]

The Scouts were INVITED GUESTS!!! You should not be discourteous to an invited guest . The ONLY acceptable way to show displeasure in this instance is to not applaud or show any other type of support . They were extremely rude in their actions and should be held accountable .They acted like school children when the teacher was out of the room .



------------------
TOM
SASS AMERICAN LEGION NRA GOA
 
The Scout Oath (or Promise)

On my honor I will do my best

To do my duty to God and my country

and to obey the Scout Law;

To help other people at all times;

To keep myself physically strong,

mentally awake, and morally straight.

Why is this so politically incorrect? I agree with Don that demeaning an individual based upon human condition alone is shameful. What if politically agendized activists decided to tell Orthodox Jews that eating non kosher pig was ok and by excluding those that did they were guilty of discrimination??

Frankly, why should anyone's sexual preference have anything to do with the everyday lives of children who ...um ARE NOT SEXUALLY ACTIVE.

There are no witch hunts in this organization that I am aware of. If your personal 'orientation' is such that it's overt display may be received unenthusiastically by a given organization - DON'T PARTICIPATE. That is freedom of choice.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by G-Freeman:

What if politically agendized activists decided to tell Orthodox Jews that eating non kosher pig was ok and by excluding those that did they were guilty of discrimination??
[/quote]

Where , pray tell , would one find "non kosher" pig ? As if there were "kosher pig" as an alternative .I believe "non kosher" and pig are synonamous .



------------------
TOM
SASS AMERICAN LEGION NRA GOA
 
Ok.. First off I feel that the The Boy Scouts banning Gays from the organazation was a pathetic and shameful. I for one pulled my support when they did it.

However. To Boo the children while they are on stage. To attack the people who had nothing to do with the decision. Well that is just wrong. Somehow as sad as it is I am not really suprized by it..

Now before I get flamed for my personal pulling of my support let me say this. THier choice to do this was no different than if they decided that Asian people should not be allowed in. If you go by thier mindset here then no women should be allowed to work for the program either. Just like I will boycott a company that denies me the RKBA I will do the same to a company that would deny someone else because of either
A: Something they are born with.
B: A choice they have made.
 
Don,
While TFL is owned by Rich, to imply that one should not speak up with con when the pro side is stated is not the same as someone's private home. There are many people on this site that may have never heard the truth of some of these issues. In this time so near the election, what a candidate or party believes is very important. As the next president goes so in many ways goes the nation. Have we not suffered from the character flaws of our current president? It is fair to criticize the Dems for their actions toward the Scouts. The Scouts are correct in their positions and should not back down. Some of the things said may seem harsh, but most of the time the purpose is not to try to insult individuals but to point out the truth regarding issues and lifestyles.
Kevinw, there is a world of difference between the Boy Scouts banning gays and banning Asians. Would you say that to ban adulterers would be the same as banning Asians? There is no sin to belong to any race, but homosexuality is a sin before God.
Regards, Jerry

------------------
Ecclesiastes 12:13  ¶Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
14  For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top