Bartholomew Roberts
Moderator
Well, the flaw in the second analysis is they only look at 5-4 or 5-3 votes where the court is already strongly divided. You could have liberal justices who had voted with conservatives 90% of the time and not even show up on that chart as a result.
As vicGT noted, in the 2016 term, unanimous votes were 57%. 5-4 splits were 14%. Yet, because the second link only measures the split votes - you get an impression of overwhelming partisanship.
As vicGT noted, in the 2016 term, unanimous votes were 57%. 5-4 splits were 14%. Yet, because the second link only measures the split votes - you get an impression of overwhelming partisanship.