Score one for the good guys

Someone like Bloomberg will step in a shore up their accounts sooner later, unless the prevailing feeling is that they are ineffective in which case maybe we'll get lucky and they'll just go away.
 
They will never go away. The principals in these organizations reorganize and re-fund themselves as new fronts whenever they mismanage or lose their funding sources.

They're suing gun makers with actions they know to be of no merit, solely for the purpose of making the manufacture of firearms in this country unprofitable.

They're trying to put gun retailers out of business by buying a few shares of stock and trying to change their direction as shareholders. Try and buy a share of stock in Brady Campaign or any other such outfit. You can't. They are closely-held tyrannies built around the personal egos of a handful of principals and funded largely by only a few donors, unanswerable to anyone.

They seek out and encourage litigation using grieving families of victims of violence, like any low-life ambulance chasing shyster.

Why shouldn't we be concerned as to what their practices are? Exposing unethical business practices and distasteful use of victims by these people to the general public is something we should be looking for.
 
You do realize that the reason you can't "buy shares" of Brady campaign stocks is that they aren't a company, they're a non profit organization. There is no stock to buy :P .

NJ has it's version of the Brady bunch, Cease fire NJ. It has one guy, literally one guy! Who lives in PA!!! But he spends his time trying to get more laws in NJ instead of PA of all things. The talking heads interview the wack job whenever a gun story pops up and no else will comment. :confused:

If you're wondering why I brought that up, I'm hoping that the Brady Bunch will eventually end up the same way, one guy with a blog no one reads.
 
ok, my point was the plaintiffs (Phillips) are on the hook for the judgment. Now, since they were acting for the Brady bunch (whether a legal fiction, or not), it would appear to me that the Brady group has a moral obligation to pony up the funds to either make the payment through the Phillips or to reimburse the Phillips after they do.

And I think that if they don't, their lack of faith should be known to the world.

After all, if they willing stick their pawns with the full (or any) of the cost of losing, it speaks volumes to the honesty and credibility about everything.

So, if they do the honorable thing, pay for the loss because they were the force behind the case all along, let them toot their own horn, if they choose to.

But if they break faith with their chosen minions, that needs public exposure, for the sake of potential future pawns, if nothing else.
 
NJ, I know they're not a corporation issuing stocks, my point, perhaps feeble as it was, is that these folks answer to no one and no one can get access to their board. A business is accountable to it's shareholders, buying public, and the media for it's business philosophy and practices. Not so with these guys.

A business would have changed management and direction years ago, from gun control to criminal control, once the expenses were totaled up and the results tallied, making it obvious to any intelligent person that a great deal of money was being spent with no positive results.
 
.. obvious to any intelligent person ..
Click to expand...

they are intelligent, and very fixated. Their goal is not the oft stated one, reducing crime, their goal is reducing guns. Crime control is a police matter, to them...and they only claim it because it plays well with the public.

They figured out, long ago, that street criminals don't MAKE guns or ammo, (in any significant amount), all "crime" guns come from legal makers and owners, originally, so by reducing the amount of guns law abiding people have, that will reduce (eventually) the guns available to the criminal element.

THAT is their focus.

I believe their reasoning is flawed, and while it sounds logical, it cannot work in the real world. I find their ideas and the laws they support to be a real pain in the butt to me enjoying my hobby, they actually increase crime and our risks, and I do not understand how people with more money than I have, or ever will have cannot simply use it to enjoy their pampered lives and leave me, and the rest of us alone to enjoy ours.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top