Aguila Blanca
Staff
Intent doesn't necessarily fit into that at all. It's not inconceivable that an avid "gun nut" who is also an avid do-it-yourselfer might have a bunch of parts lying around that could be assembled into an illegal ... something. The BATFE could 0-- and has -- prosecute for constructive possession even if the person has no intention of mating the offending parts together.Tom Servo said:There's also the whole doctrine of Constructive Possession that the ATF so loves. Intent factors into that as well.
One example might be a modern reproduction shoulder stock for a Luger. Someone light buy one with the intent of displaying the stock next to the pistol, but have no intention of mounting it.
Another example might have been a flash hider during the Clinton AWB period. If you owned a legal, post-ban AR-15 with a (legal) compensator but you also had a flash suppressor on your work bench, you could have been charged with constructive possession. Not because you intended to put the flash suppressor on the AR, but because you could do so. That's the insidious aspect to the constructive possession snake.