Savage 16 Trophy Hunter review

Pistola Pedro

New member
I decided to buy this particular Savage rifle package just so I could had a solid "do all" hunting rifle. I decided on .308 based on many reasons, but mostly for easy access to both high quality and cheap ammo types.
I love how this gun has zero parts that I have to really worry about in bad weather conditions. It's also nice and light weight. Groups are very good with good ammo ( I honestly can't claim to know the accuracy potential because I'm not much better than a 1 MOA shooter. It can shoot 1 MOA with many loads.) The scope is actually pretty decent for an included scope. It's certainly not as nice as other scopes I have owned, but those scopes were also upwards of $400 without rings. This one is plenty sufficient for most hunting purposes and will only lag in usable time by 5 or 10 minutes of sunlight at dawn and dusk at most. I see no need to upgrade, but may do so just because I like higher zoom and side focus scopes.
The accutrigger is really nice. I don't like triggers that have more than one piece typically ( looking at you Glock), but this one is very light and crisp when adjusted as mine is. I use the safety insert as sort of a 2 stage trigger.
Speaking of safety, I like the Savage safety system best. It's a good 3 position safety that is in the most sensible location for me.
The bolt isn't what I would call silky smooth, but I didn't expect it to be. It's perfectly functional and that's all I cared about. If you want a rifle that feels like a million bucks than this isn't it and it isn't priced like it either ( I paid $600 for the package)
Here's my big GRIPE about this rifle and Savage in general. They make a perfectly functional rifle that is everything you want it to be and then they go cheap on the magazine system. WHY?????? I had a much more expensive model with the "nicer" mags and still found it to be a really unimpressive part of the rifle. Savage, you should be embarassed! What would it cost to have a system with positive lock up every time? Honestly? My AR's have always been good with that. Every single one of my pistols has always figured that out. Even my cheap rimfire rifles have decent magazines with solid retention systems. What makes you think that no one cares about this? What makes you think that we wouldn't HAPPILY pay the extra 5-10 dollars it would take for you to manufacture a solid solution here? Fix it! It is the only thing that is holding you back from being an EXCELLENT value rifle instead of simply a decent value rifle. I've been embarrassed more than once at the range to have the mag simply pop out while shooting and God forbid it ever cost me a deer. Can I fix it? Yeah, but I shouldn't have to. Okay, enough about that and enough rhetorical questions.
The stock isn't one that evokes pride, but it doesn't really hold you back and is lightweight. The butt padd has a nice thick chunk of soft rubber that saves your shoulder on those long days of putting a bunch of rounds downrange.
Overall, I think this is a good deal and I am happy with this rifle. Minus the one major complaint, I have no qualms about recommending one to anyone looking at it.
Pete
 
A couple of observations.

It's also nice and light weight

At about 7 lbs naked it'll be about 8-8.5 lbs with scope, mounts, ammo and a carry strap. That is about average weight for a 308 bolt gun and 1-2lbs heavier than many modern options.

then they go cheap on the magazine system.

The current Savage magazines are much improved over previous versions and are as good or better than most of the competition. I'm not a huge fan of Savage rifles, but their magazine system is one of their good points. I assume yours is the detachable mag version. They offer the rifle with that and a floor plate. They used to also offer a blind magaine

I'm not understanding what your complaint is, possibly you have a defective rifle but I can find no fault with their magazine design.
 
I am well aware that there are lighter rifles. I own several. I'm simply pointing out that it's a good weight for an all around rifle. We can all look up the specs, but thanks for posting them anyway. I defy you to prove that it is average. With the incredible number of barrel profiles and rifle makes, you're out of your league making that statement.
I can find fault with the mags and so can many others. Maybe you got lucky. I need not be schooled on the different systems that Savage offers. You stated that it's THE detachable box mag system as if they only have one. That is incorrect. Furthermore, I don't care if you consider it a strength or not. It is ludicrous for them to not have further developed this system when they are competing to stay relevant with the newer semi automatic systems with extremely easy to use mag systems (please see the AR-10 platform for an example). A poorly made plastic mag, with a flimsy plastic tab to lock into a poorly cut out lip on a plastic stock is my complaint. Do you understand now?
 
Well that escalated quickly...

I have shot several Savage rifles, though never the 16 Trophy Hunter. I will agree that the magazine system seems a little chintzy at first glance. But at the same time, IN MY OPINION (THIS IS A FORUM, WE ARE HERE TO SHARE OPINIONS) a bolt action rifle in this category doesn't really have lots of mag changes as a philosophy of use. Could they come up with something aluminum/steel or quick release? They already have those on their scout rifles... but for the purpose of the rifle and the cost point they are aiming for, they have the best in the market. IN MY OPINION. Go ahead and yell at me now :D
 
i have the 11 TH and love it.
It took me a trip to the range to trust the detachable magazine completely, but I have full faith in it.
Good luck with yours.
 
Please do not misconstrue my comments as yelling at anybody. I'm not doing that and I wouldn't.
However, I took the time to write MY opinion and the first thing that someone comes along to do is to take two opinions and present them as factually wrong. Now, some newbie will come along and assume that I'm wrong about this being a nice weight for an all around rifle and go buy a 6 pounder that beats them up. Then they will read that I was wrong and that Savage actually has a great magazine system (it IS a workable system, but that doesn't mean that we consumers shouldn't challenge them to do better and change to industry standard mags like some of their competitors have done) hickok45 just posted a review on the Savage and also noted mag problems. I'm not making it up to attack a rifle that I bought and actually like.
I don't mind opinions, but when you can only post attacks on my opinions as if you have better knowledge, you need to be able to back it up with fact.
Is that fair? Doesn't that help the newcomers more than simply popping in to try and discredit honest reviews? If I'm wrong, let me know. I'm just trying to help.
 
All fair comments

but the others are as well including two alternatives to the magazine problem you feel it has.

Frankly I would not buy a removable magazine for a hunting in particular or target rifle.

It really serves no use which is good for new gun owners to think about.

Blind is fine, floor place occasionally useful.
 
The last Savage 116 I saw with a detachable magazine had stainless bottom metal and a steel magazine. IDK, but the plastic magazine may be something new on the package deal. I have a Model 10FCP with the detachable magazine, it feeds great from the top or bottom, and has never fallen out. It has many THOUSANDS of rounds through it.
 
I picked up a Savage 116 in 6.5-284 last summer and have no regrets with it to date. I used it deer and elk hunting this year and took a cow with. For the money, in my opinion, it is a good buy and I would recommend it to friends in the market for an entry level big game rifle. I too don't like the plastic mags but in all fairness they have not failed me as long as I do my part and make sure it is seated properly.
 
Back
Top