Bartholomew Roberts
Moderator
Mauser8mm said:I heard this is going to be a compromise so maybe if we let these people pass the bill they will get off of our backs about "assault weapons."
I see you are new to the gun rights scene.
Mauser8mm said:I heard this is going to be a compromise so maybe if we let these people pass the bill they will get off of our backs about "assault weapons."
Also, surprisingly, one of the Senators from Conn. said "this is a good first step....". Well, there you have it. The reason most gun owners don't agree to any of this nonsense, it is not the end game. It is just the first step.
educating the public about firearms at a young age, so they don't grow up scared of them, and maybe will respect them more.
overhead said:But, I did not think Reid would risk his red state senators for this vote either, so what do I know? And I certainly did not think all those Republicans would commit career suicide voting to move forward.
This is irritating since I want to transfer a handgun to my Son-in-Law. In order for this to happen he must pass his handgun safety test, then we take the gun to the FFL and fill out the paperwork for the background check, pay the fees, and then he waits 10 days before he can pick up the gun. If I transfer it to my daughter, I just hand her the gun and it is done.
Can you just hand your gun to your daughter, and then she can gift it to her husband without going through all of the nonsense? Or is there something in the law which specifically prohibits a double transfer between close relatives? These laws are so imbecilic.
A separate, subsequent attempt by Maynard to buy a firearm failed when the background check system flagged him, Sparks said.