Rush, Hannity, Boortz

DavidJBlythe

New member
Does anyone listen to these guys on their local talk radio stations? I listen to all three, for about nine hours a day, one after another. They are pretty strong supporters of 2nd Ammendment rights and give us a good name. If you only listen to one which one?
 
I like them all. Hannity is probably my faviorite of the 3 you listed.
Hey David, if you like them - check out Anne Coulter and Michelle Malkin.
Malkins new book, "Unhinged" is a great read so far - as are all of Coulters books.
 
Sean Hannity won me over when he thrashed that punk (who made up a website called foresakethetroops.org) who pubically slandered and belittled our troops...


.
 
I like all three as well. they don't come much more conservative than those guys. I also listen to Laura Ingraham as well(560AM)here in Chi-town.
 
Belongs in L&P

No. There is already PLENTY of hot air blowing up from the south winds where I live. Yeah, they're somewhat pro-2A, but be careful, or you'll become indoctrinated as a war-mongerin', patriot-act-lovin', war-on-some-drugs-lovin', big-spendin', big-taxin', big-government, 1st-amendment-obliteratin', environment-destroyin' Neo-con.
 
I listen to Rush if I am in the car when he is on (got a real job:D )

I have a hard time listening to Hannity...not sure if Boortz is on around here

I agree with most of what they have to say....but the format can be painful
 
FirstFreedom, I'm proud to be called all of the above, with the exception of "big spendin, and big-taxin"..we all know thats the Dems job. They raise my taxes, then spend it on everyone but me. I like how you tried to slip it in there though.
 
big spendin, and big-taxin"..we all know thats the Dems job.

You don't your facts, at least at the federal level.

NON-DEFENSE, NON-ENTITLEMENT, discretionary spending by the fedgov (mind you, NOT counting defense spending, so you can't use the wars as an excuse) has risen more in relation in total and in relation to GDP, under George W. Bush than ANY president since Lyndon B. Johnson, and that includes Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and repub presidents with with democrat congresses. And this is WITH a republican house AND senate!

There is NO big spender like a (new) Republican big spender.

Traditionally, what you say is right, but no more!

And I find it quite illuminating that you're proud to say that you obliterate the first amendment and destroy the environment. :p
 
NON-DEFENSE, NON-ENTITLEMENT, discretionary spending by the fedgov (mind you, NOT counting defense spending, so you can't use the wars as an excuse) has risen more in relation in total and in relation to GDP, under George W. Bush than ANY president since Lyndon B. Johnson, and that includes Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and repub presidents with with democrat congresses. And this is WITH a republican house AND senate!
So is it Boortz Hannity or Rush that's responsible for all that?

I like Boortz, he doesn't take himself to seriously and pretty much says what's on his mind

Rush is a little too full of himself

Hannity is a republican shill that uses the same shout-down , cut-off, and word twisting techniques that I despise from the libs when he does his interviews
 
I listen to Boortz. I love his program. In Jax, we only get 3 hours so I tape it at home to get the extra 1 1/2 hours we dont get. www.boortz.com

Rush is ok but is too far right. I would listen to him more if he would start scheduling his show better. I cannot stand double 3-4 minute breaks back to back.

Hannity is far to in love with himself for me to listen to although I do enjoy hearing him cut down his opponents. He shows no respect.

Savage is fun to listen to but his rants do NOT give anybody a good name.
 
I have listened to Boortz since the late 70's...
Rush since he started in '88...
Hannity since he was a nobody in Huntsville, AL

I used to love listening to them.

Since 2000, I don't listen to any of the 3, and consider them all pseudo-conservatives who are willing to say anything, as long as the money keeps rolling in. They are nothing but outrageous shills for the Republican party.

As a parent of a Navy LT serving in the Persian Gulf and a Marine 2nd Lt. who will soon be on his way over there, I believe I have the right to say that these chickenhawks, for all their blather, care NOTHING for the people who must do the sacrificing when idiotic decisions are made by politicians. They have no skin in the game, so, it's EASY being "for the troops". It cost them nothing.

I'm a true consevative. With federal spending at an all-time high, the military in crisis, personal privacy a thing of the past, etc., can anyone tell me how it would be different with a Democrat as President?
 
I guess that I'm one:

Rush: 9 to 11am

Lars Larson: 11am to 2pm

Tony Snow: 2pm to 4pm

Lars Larson (National show): 4pm to 7pm

Lars Larson is the grassroots voice of Oregon and Washington (SW). He is HEAVY into the 2nd but he's drank some of the anti kool-aid on some parts of it, about the same as many members here, but that's okay, I forgive him and you :D.

He's got the National Show now and he's pretty good with local and national issues. If you haven't heard him you can go to www.larslarson.com and check him out if you wish.

You have to admit that Rush is right (about what the dems are going to do/say the next day) pretty much all the time. As for Savage, I think that he's insane and he wonders in thought too much. But I'd rather listen to Lars since he has the same time slot as Savage.

I've given up on this "music" or whatever you want to call it now. Most music gives me a headache (even the old stuff I used to listen to) and since I like background noise, I listen to talk radio.

Wayne
 
Back
Top