Ruger Redhawk VS. S&W629

My vote goes to Ruger but I have to admit I don't own a SW. I have a Super Redhawk that is a dream to shoot especially after putting in the 10 dollar Wolf spring kit. This thing shoots really nice groups with every different reload I've tried so far, at 50 yards I'm getting a 3 inch group using a red dot and a rest.

I also just bought a GP100 357 mag, looked at the Smiths but I just couldn't do it. Haven't shot the GP yet but I have little doubt I won't like it.

Go for a Ruger, pick your flavor.
 
If you can find one, try a Redhawk with 8-10k dry fires or live fires (or combo), or a decent trigger job.

I found myself facing the same choice as the OP a year or two ago, ultimately went with the Ruger since I was looking for an all weather field gun.

My first initial is S, my last name starts with a W. AFAIK my closest blood relation to Mr. Smith or Mr. Wesson would require going back to Adam and taking a different fork, but for many many years all my handguns had my initials stamped on them at the factory.

Once I had about 3k rounds through my Redhawk I felt a LOT better about it, closing in on 10k rounds + dry fires now and I have a really nice action.
 
IMG_20131022_174155_889_zpsc2cd3835.jpg
 
Great find at a great price.

I think you'll love it. Here's the first 10 I fired through mine:

attachment.php


Yah, that's a flyer down below.

W.
 
I agree with the others that say the S&W is more refined. I've owned several S&W revolvers & shoot a 686 in comp. Several other shooters at our club also shoot various models S&W revolvers in comp. I don't see any Rugers. I find Rugers are stout, but the S&W's are stout enough.
Several years ago I purchased a S&W 629 & went to the range. The shooter next to me had a new Redhawk. We tried each others guns. He said he should of gotten a S&W. I agree.
 
I have a Super Redhawk for my +P+ reloads but enjoy my S&W 629's for their more refined trigger characteristics.

If you get only one.44 Magnum revolver, my recommendation is for the S&W 29/629.
 
I had the same dilemma last year. I wanted another 44 Mag snubby and it was between the Alaskan and the PC 629. For $100 more I got the S&W. I will not be shooting super heavy bullets, mostly 180's loaded fast so i have no need for the longer cylinder. If it was just a plinking gun I would look hard at a Super Black Hawk I have a Bisley with a 7 1/2" barrel that is a pleasure to shoot.
 
The S&W is more refined, better trigger, better machine work, however is not as overbuilt, won't handle some of the really hot loads well.

The Ruger won't be as smooth, won't have as clean a trigger, will probably have some edges, etc from the factory you want to work on. It will, however be tougher and handle hot loads better.

The S&W is a lowered pickup truck; it has some utility however in the end won't handle the rough as well. The Ruger is a full on stock overbuilt truck.
 
Am curious what you consider the disadvantage to be (when shooting SA)?
Click to expand...
I have a tendency to look at things as to how there are capable of being used optimally. For instance, a skilled Cowboy Action shooter can fire his single-action rapidly and accurately because he takes advantage of the grip rolling up into his hand, under his thumb. Given the hump on a double-action, that will not happen. However, if a person with a double-action just slow-fires his gun in single-action mode, the hump then would not be any great hindrance. My mind-set is, if I am going to do something (like shoot single-action), I want to become really good at it. Unless someone (like yourself, with your question), suggests someone elses way of thinking, it generally does not occur to me.

As for non-sporting uses of double-actions (self-defense), I cannot imagine any realistic use of single-action shooting using a double-action revolver and have removed or purchased guns without hammer spurs. I have never heard a logical, realistic rationale for using a D.A. in S.A. in a self-defense situation.
 
Just as an aside, I owned both a 4" nickel 29-2 and a blue 5 1/2" blue Redhawk for several years. Both of them were 44's. I was in my Hot Loads/Heavy Bullets phase and both guns saw hundreds of them. I had refined the SA trigger on the Redhawk to the point where it rivaled the Smith. I had also installed an over-travel stop. Either would do 4" at 100 yards, once around the cylinder, back when my eyes were capable of it.

Anyhow I decided I was going to move one on and because the 29 had some sentimental value, the Redhawk went. This was a mistake. The Smith was a fine example of the breed, but needed a 2nd trip back to the factory the following year and its rear sight got so loose that it couldn't be trusted to hold a setting.

Long story short- if you want a really nice revolver to shoot a few head of game with and admire for its refinement, the S&W will serve you well. But the Redhawk will do anything the Smith will do and handle abuse like a T33 tank.

Show horse or work horse; either will get you there. Take your pick.
 
Both are good guns(the best revolvers on the market)While the Smith is prettier, the Ruger is more durable and I think the best for hunting.
 
Had both, kept the Smith.
Click to expand...

Me too, but I kept the Redhawk-and I have the best reason of all for doing so: it was a Father's Day gift from my wife (the only firearm she's ever given me) a few decades ago. I had a Model 629 for a while and there's many things I prefer about it over the big Ruger, including a better trigger pull (especially in sa); a more compact configuration and (subjectively) it's a much better looking revolver. But the Redhawk is tough in the extreme and is much simpler to field-strip should the occasion arise.
No wrong choice here. If you plan on shooting a lot of hot reloads and like the simplicity of the Ruger build, get the Redhawk. On the other hand, if you appreciate a superb trigger pull and are justifyily enamored by the Model 629's svelte looks and feel, get the Smith. If you're so lucky as to receive one of the two from your wife as a gift-keep it. :)
 
Had both traded what a MISTAKE!

I too had both 6" 629 and 7.5 SRH. In a moment of weakness I let a friend trade me out of the SRH. Big mistake for me as I used it to hunt with. The 629 is a good gun just preferred the SHR for my use.
 
Today while opening some old mail ran across a mailing from Gun Tests. At some point they tested a 629 and a Redhawk. The 629 they tested, presumably new, unlocked the cylinder when it fired "leaving the chamber out of alignment".
Am I correct that Smith guarantees their firearms "forever"? But returning them can be a hassle and involve some expense. And with a new one, the emotions involved would not be positive.
The only S&W I have ever owned is a Model 36, with added Tyler T-Grip. I loaned it to my son for a week and he immediately shopped for one for himself.
 
I don't think that example is typical of N-frame quality, just as barrels falling off Redhawks was not typical, just during that period of use of that cutting oil. I would buy either without hesitation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top