"Ruger only" loads

G

griffin12aaa

New member
Is there such a thing? Like say buffalo bore, double tap and underwood?
Ive been wanting some hot 357s just because they sound fun but is the "ruger only" deal just a myth or is it real?

Only read of this in 357 and 44 magnum.

I need a really hot load for them zombie water jugs! :)
 
It is absolutely not a Myth. I am more familiar with the .45 Colt Ruger only loads than anything else. Some of the hot and heavy .45 Colt loads as far as handguns go should only be used in Ruger Redhawks, Blackhawks, Super Redhawks, and the older style original Vaquero. The Ruger New Vaqueros can only handle standard pressure .45 Colt as well as S&W's unless chambered in .454.
 
Last edited:
The "Ruger Only" loads are also safe in a few other guns such as the Colt Anaconda, large frame Dan Wesson's and Freedom Arms.

That said, a few loads can only be used in Ruger Redhawks and Super Redhawks due to the loaded length being too long for any other revolver. This is especially true of Freedom Arms. Their guns are insanely strong, but have a very short cylinder that seriously limits the rounds that will chamber.
 
Ruger Only

The Georgia Arms "Deerstopper" (260gr,1200 fps)45 Colt come with warnings about using it only in Ruger,Freedom Arms,and Thompson Center Contender handguns,The original Vaquero is basically a fixed sight Blackhawk and very strong-but the New Vaquero is built along the lines of the Colt SAA and unable to handle hot loads.I have an original Vaquero in 44 Magnum-you don't see that many of them.
 
There are some "44Mag+P" loads meant for the over-length cylinders in the Ruger Redhawk and SuperRedhawk (but NOT SuperBlackhawk) from Garrett Cartridges:

http://www.garrettcartridges.com/44mag.html

There are NO 357Magnum "Ruger ONLY!" loads. I do know of some load data for the insanely strong Freedom Arms full-size 5-shot 357 that are in a whole 'nuther world :).

I think Garrett are the only ones messing with the idea of a 44Mag+P right now.
 
No "Ruger only" in .357 Mag or .44 Mag
Click to expand...

I think Garrett are the only ones messing with the idea of a 44Mag+P right now.
Click to expand...

Technically this would be considered a .44 magnum Ruger only load

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=54

This new load is designed ONLY for certain firearms. They are as follows; Ruger Red Hawk, Ruger Super Red Hawk, Ruger Super Blackhawk or Vaquero, Freedom Arms Model 83, Taurus Raging Bull, Colt Anaconda and Dan Wesson Revolvers. Suitable rifles include T/C Encore, "modified" Marlin 1894

This is a +P+ .44 magnum load. I can imagine it would be a handfull.

Heavy .44 Magnum +P+ Ammo - 340 gr. L.F.N. - G.C. (1,478 fps/M.E. 1,649 ft. lbs.) - 20 Round Box
 
I believe the so called "myth" of the ruger only load for .357 magnum comes from the ruger redhawk chambered in .357.

An article once talked about a group of shotoers that had been destruction testing gp100s with tested loads that were well well well past the original .357 proof loads. and shooting massive amounts.
 
"Ruger only" was a convenient way of saying "not for Colt SAA's, other old guns, or reproductions of same." Listing all the old .45 Colt caliber guns that could NOT handle high pressure loads would be impractical, so "Ruger only" came into use.

Jim
 
I am a long time Ruger abuser.
Years ago I fell in love with the 44mag round and bought a Ruger SBH with a 10 inch bull barrel.
I up loaded this round till I had catastrophic case failures and back the load down a bit.
I tried to shoot one of these rounds in one of my S&W model 29’s and cracked the top strap and split the cylinder.
Years later I tried it again in another model 29 thinking maybe it was just a fluke failure and cracked the top strap on that model 29.
I will not post these loads as I fear someone would attempt to duplicate and injure themselves or others.
This leads me to believe that Ruger produces a stronger frame than most other manufacturers; at least in 44 magnum revolvers.
I could be wrong in my thinking but after destroying 2 S&W 29’s I feel pretty confident in my assumption.
 
Be careful! These "Ruger only" loads don't apply to all Rugers. For example: the 45 Colt New Vaqueros and the Flat top Blackhawk 45 Colts can NOT handle these hot loads. You've got to know your Ruger.
 
Thats why when I was looking for a 44mag I got the Ruger Alaskan, when loaded it weighs almost 3 pounds with a 2 1/2 inch barrel
 
I get a picture posted for ya.
Lets put it this way; a 340gn bullet will fly over 1700 fps if ya can hang on to the gun and will pass through a phone pole like butter.
 
Be careful! These "Ruger only" loads don't apply to all Rugers. For example: the 45 Colt New Vaqueros and the Flat top Blackhawk 45 Colts can NOT handle these hot loads.
Click to expand...

While you are right about the New Vaqueros not handling heavy +P .45 Colt Loads, the Blackhawk handles them perfectly fine.

According to Buffalo Bore

These Heavy .45 Colt +P loads are safe in all LARGE FRAME Ruger revolvers.
(includes Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk, all pre-2005 Vaquero, Bisley, Redhawk)
Click to expand...
 
Ruger Only loads also applies to 32 H&R magnum. As the round was originally developed to be fired in the H&R models 504, 532, and 586 revolvers it was held to 21k CUP. Rugers, Dan Wesson, S&W, F.A, et. al can handle more pressure safely. We get to make the 32 H&R a lot closer to what it should be.
 
While you are right about the New Vaqueros not handling heavy +P .45 Colt Loads, the Blackhawk handles them perfectly fine.
Click to expand...

Not 100%!

There has been a special distributor run of "flattop" 45LC/45ACP convertable Blackhawks built on the NewVaq-sized "mid-frame". I kid you not. Same horsepower limits as a NewVaq.

Ruger is being very stupid on this issue.
 
There has been a special distributor run of "flattop" 45LC/45ACP convertable Blackhawks built on the NewVaq-sized "mid-frame". I kid you not. Same horsepower limits as a NewVaq.

Ruger is being very stupid on this issue.
Click to expand...

Wow, that sounds like a recipe for disaster. Thanks for the heads up. Might not be a bad idea to email Buffalo Bore and let them know so they can add it to their page.
 
I would argue there is such a thing as ruger only in 357 Magnum.

redhawk_vs_pre27.jpg


Here is a redhawk 357 next to a S&W Pre-27, or what is normally considered a big N frame. The S&W is danty compared to my rugers.

redhawk_cylinder.jpg


Look at the amount of steel around those little 357 Magnums.

I now have several of these big Redhawks and have been loading them up for real power with 357 mag loads that would make Phil Sharpe proud. It is a lot of fun to cut loose real full power 357 Mag loads where I am tossing a 158 at 1550 FPS like they did back in the 1930's to 1960's. Not like the 1200 fps of today, but full power. You know Ruger only power.

To me the 357 Redhawk is the 38/44 Outdoorsman of the modern times. Way over built, big, heavy, strong and will last a life time or until I decide I want to load some 363 Casull loads in one of them. (I have already designated one of the 7.5" as a test gun for absurd loads. The other I have for fun).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top