Edit: this is a response to a post that claims that Ruger's are weak because they have cast frames. I'm not sure why the quote function didn't work so I apologize in advance.
BS. It's a Ruger... you can shoot roofing nails through the thing and not hurt it. No matter what you can say about a Ruger you cannot say that they are weak guns.
PS the "roofing nails" part is an analogy meant to highlight the strength of a Ruger frame..... I'm sure someone will think I meant you could actually shoot roofing nails in the gun.....
While I'm at it I will offer my opinion that the Ruger GP100 Match Champion is a fine revolver. I've owned 2; I bought one of the very first ones when they came out and I returned it to the factory due to the fact that it "never should have left the factory" according to the head of CS. The replacement was built properly and I put thousands of rounds through it. The GP100 is a fine revolver that is fairly easy to tune and smooth out. I currently run Smith & Wesson 686SSR revolvers that have been tuned by Clark Custom. I prefer Smiths but that is in no way a ding against Ruger revolvers.
A Ruger is a fine, well built, heavy duty revolver that will take a lifetime of use.