If Romney or Giuliani gets elected, they'll vote for another AWB as well. But I'm not sure Congress will bring one to the president's desk. The Democrats have been pretty silent on guns over these past years, so it's possible they've learned their lesson from past electoral losses due to that issue.
Other GOP candidates, even if they wouldn't support such measures (far from assured), will likely support other violations of the Constitution. Ready for more warrantless wiretapping, facial-recognition cameras on every city street corner, mass email monitoring, and general police-state surveillance? Don't laugh -- a LOT of government funding is being spent on research into newer and better technologies for citizen control.
Even Mike Huckabee, whom I regard as the least offensive GOP candidate besides Ron Paul, has echoed Al Gore's line that "the Constitution is a living, breathing document." :barf:
Actually, the Constitution is a dying, gasping document. If we continue to vote for the lesser of two evils, then we cannot expect to get good. Something needs to change big-time if the Constitution is to be saved. If the majority refuses to take part in this change, then it cannot hold responsible the minority who insist on that change.
How far has voting for the lesser of two evils gotten gun rights in America since 1934? We should look at the big picture and long-term direction of this country beyond the next election.