I recall reading somewhere that shotguns are still used to take out feral dogs in Afghanistan. I am unsure of how often they are used today in door-to-door, but my guess is they are much-loved by any Navy unit, especially on a boat. I know that the Navy still purchases Mossbergs, so I'm sure they are utilized to some degree. I know for certain the Coast Guard use them on watch.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
role of combat shotgun
- Thread starter rifleman8
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
FireForged
New member
Do you mean in WAR, as in issued to infantry? I dont think anyone would consider that a very practicle place for a shotgun ( except in some very-very limited and temporary instances, like a trench.)
Used within its design capabilities and range, its a awesome weapon. As a citizen, I would take a shotgun into just about any defensive situation I can imagine. If I were a soldier, it wouldnt even be in the top three.
As far as the term "combat" shotgun... Im not really on board with such taglines.
Used within its design capabilities and range, its a awesome weapon. As a citizen, I would take a shotgun into just about any defensive situation I can imagine. If I were a soldier, it wouldnt even be in the top three.
As far as the term "combat" shotgun... Im not really on board with such taglines.
Last edited:
theinvisibleheart
New member
even wearing a vest, you can get severely injured with shots/slug due to some energy transference.
Check photos of trauma injury incurred by folks who were shot by shotgun while wearing vest.
As for round limitation, most confrontation, outside of military, tend to be very limited in number of rounds expended.
Check photos of trauma injury incurred by folks who were shot by shotgun while wearing vest.
As for round limitation, most confrontation, outside of military, tend to be very limited in number of rounds expended.
allaroundhunter
New member
With 00 buck you are limited to 12-15 yards maximum effective range
You are kidding, right?
It won't have the range of a rifle, sure; but saying that the max effective range of 00 buck is 15 yards is just flat wrong.
Last edited:
"I wouldn't be surprised if I found out that the last time a shotgun was actually fired in the direction of an enemy soldier was during the Vietnam war." Really? Where do you get this stuff?
Here is article from
Guns and Ammo web site from actual combat - The Magnificent Mossberg
Solid, reliable and hard-hitting, the 590 soldiers on in Iraq.
By Jeremy Stafford Posted: 2007-03
http://archives.gunsandammo.com/content/the-magnificent-mossberg
And from Navy Seals web site, list of firearms used:
http://www.navyseals.com/weapons-demo
I know from eyewitness accounts, the SEALS are also carrying 870s and 590s and even .357 revolvers and suppressed Ruger MKIIs and a bunch of other firearms as approved for each operator.
It is a fact beyond dispute that shotguns were used more in Vietnam, but they are still being used in certain situations - today. I expect the shotgun will in fact become "obsolete" and not be used outside of Special Forces in the near future. Special forces, SEALS et al, as so mission specific, they will continue using shotguns in combat on specific missions. Currently, they are used to breech doors and used to clear rooms. As has been noted, there are better choices for close quarters combat.
Here is article from
Guns and Ammo web site from actual combat - The Magnificent Mossberg
Solid, reliable and hard-hitting, the 590 soldiers on in Iraq.
By Jeremy Stafford Posted: 2007-03
http://archives.gunsandammo.com/content/the-magnificent-mossberg
And from Navy Seals web site, list of firearms used:
http://www.navyseals.com/weapons-demo
I know from eyewitness accounts, the SEALS are also carrying 870s and 590s and even .357 revolvers and suppressed Ruger MKIIs and a bunch of other firearms as approved for each operator.
It is a fact beyond dispute that shotguns were used more in Vietnam, but they are still being used in certain situations - today. I expect the shotgun will in fact become "obsolete" and not be used outside of Special Forces in the near future. Special forces, SEALS et al, as so mission specific, they will continue using shotguns in combat on specific missions. Currently, they are used to breech doors and used to clear rooms. As has been noted, there are better choices for close quarters combat.
Shotgun
I believe the shotgun may be more useful than some of the posters believe. The excerpt is from an article in The Army Lawyer (non-copyrighted US Govt publication):
OCTOBER 1997 THE ARMY LAWYER • DA-PAM 27-50-299
Joint Service Combat Shotgun Program
W. Hays Parks
Special Assistant for Law of War Matters,
Office of The Judge Advocate General, U.S. Army
Washington, D.C.
This objective has been borne out in combat. British examination of
its Malaya experience determined that, to a range of thirty yards
(27.4 meters), the probability of hitting a man-sized target with
a shotgun was superior to that of all other weapons. The probability
of hitting the intended target with an assault rifle was
one in eleven. It was one in eight with a submachine gun firing
a five-round burst. Shotguns had a hit probability ratio twice as
good as rifles. A 1952 British study by the Commander of British
Security Forces, compiled from combat action reports, tests,
and other studies (including medical), reconfirmed the previous
finding that the shotgun was a highly-effective combat weapon
at ranges out to seventy-five yards (68.6 meters).13
I believe the shotgun may be more useful than some of the posters believe. The excerpt is from an article in The Army Lawyer (non-copyrighted US Govt publication):
OCTOBER 1997 THE ARMY LAWYER • DA-PAM 27-50-299
Joint Service Combat Shotgun Program
W. Hays Parks
Special Assistant for Law of War Matters,
Office of The Judge Advocate General, U.S. Army
Washington, D.C.
This objective has been borne out in combat. British examination of
its Malaya experience determined that, to a range of thirty yards
(27.4 meters), the probability of hitting a man-sized target with
a shotgun was superior to that of all other weapons. The probability
of hitting the intended target with an assault rifle was
one in eleven. It was one in eight with a submachine gun firing
a five-round burst. Shotguns had a hit probability ratio twice as
good as rifles. A 1952 British study by the Commander of British
Security Forces, compiled from combat action reports, tests,
and other studies (including medical), reconfirmed the previous
finding that the shotgun was a highly-effective combat weapon
at ranges out to seventy-five yards (68.6 meters).13
IIRC there are some legal objections-is there any FMJ shotgun ammo that would comply with Geneva Convention requirements ? Only place I saw shotguns in the Army was in the National Guard, and they were strictly for civil disturbance use. Also I recall some attempts to provide 20 gage shotguns for village defense in Vietnam, the idea being a low recoil point and shoot weapon that required minimal training.
TheSILENTtype
New member
The CSG or any SG for that matter, has and will outlast us all.
Weather it is being taken to Bambis house, tracking a bear, in a home defense situation or even in a CZ ; the SG will seemingly always have a place in each field.
It has certainly not met its expiry and without question the 590 and 870 the ithica amidst many others are still being used common place.
Weather it is being taken to Bambis house, tracking a bear, in a home defense situation or even in a CZ ; the SG will seemingly always have a place in each field.
It has certainly not met its expiry and without question the 590 and 870 the ithica amidst many others are still being used common place.
Chuckusaret
Moderator
[/QUOTE]The CSG or any SG for that matter, has and will outlastus all.
Weather it is being taken to Bambis house, tracking a bear, in a home defense situation or even in a CZ ; the SG will seemingly always have a place in each field.
It has certainly not met its expiry and without question the 590 and 870 the ithica amidst many others are still being used common place.[/QUOTE]
I was never assigned to a unit that did not have shotguns in the arms room, but I was always assigned to a combat unit and never assigned to a REU. I thank the man upstairs, I was never a REMF.
Weather it is being taken to Bambis house, tracking a bear, in a home defense situation or even in a CZ ; the SG will seemingly always have a place in each field.
It has certainly not met its expiry and without question the 590 and 870 the ithica amidst many others are still being used common place.[/QUOTE]
I was never assigned to a unit that did not have shotguns in the arms room, but I was always assigned to a combat unit and never assigned to a REU. I thank the man upstairs, I was never a REMF.
jokester_143
New member
On a few patrols, while deployed in 08/09, I had a Mossberg 500. One of the ones I carried was a short barreled one, and another was a "full size" one, and it depended on if the assigned person came out on patrol or if someone was covering down on their weapon system.
Due to the current R.O.E. (Rules of Engagement) at the time, and the "transition of authority" we were required to have the capability to use less lethal rounds in some situations. Being as such, we were required to have "X" amount of weapon systems capable of deploying less lethal munitions, which were shotguns and M203 grenade launchers Our shotguns still had shot in the tubes, but the first round was less lethal.
Shotguns are one of the most versatile weapon systems around, and when used in the proper matter, most effective. What other weapon system (portable) can fire buck, slug, less lethal, exploding, ect?
(BTW: The couple of times I carried it, I also had my M4 slung in case of further engagements)
Due to the current R.O.E. (Rules of Engagement) at the time, and the "transition of authority" we were required to have the capability to use less lethal rounds in some situations. Being as such, we were required to have "X" amount of weapon systems capable of deploying less lethal munitions, which were shotguns and M203 grenade launchers Our shotguns still had shot in the tubes, but the first round was less lethal.
Shotguns are one of the most versatile weapon systems around, and when used in the proper matter, most effective. What other weapon system (portable) can fire buck, slug, less lethal, exploding, ect?
(BTW: The couple of times I carried it, I also had my M4 slung in case of further engagements)
As a defensive weapon it has long been obsolete. Compared to a carbine AR you are looking at a heavier, more awkward gun with limited range and ammo capacity. You are also looking at almost 30 ft lbs of recoil vs 4-5 ft lbs for an AR.
Perhaps with conventional shotguns, but there is the AA12- full auto, reduced recoil, 20 or 32 round magazines. Empty weight probably isn't that much more than an AR with the extra crap bolted onto it (32 rounds of 12 gauge is a bit hefty though). For certain urban warfare applications, I would think something like that could be quite useful.
As a soldier, I'd rather have an M4. It's a no brainer. Marginally less effective within 30 yards and better at every distance beyond that. One guy to breach the door carrying a cruiser as his secondary is fine, but the idea of carrying one big enough to be a practical primary like an AA-12 is stupid for mainline combatants. You've got more important stuff to carry than a situational weapon.
Strafer Gott
New member
It might seem stupid in Iraq or Afghanistan, but it wasn't stupid in the Viet Nam. I guess it would seem stupid to somebody who hasn't seen engagement at pistol range, with troops that want to lay down to shoot, because that's how they trained! Shotguns are useful to the "taking care of business" guys to get the level of fire up to suppression levels, while the rest of the squad is finding a nice place to lay down to shoot. Wish we had M1Super 90's back then. Mostly M37, some shot loads for the M79. I like the thumper, but with shot it wasn't much for range.
I believe you and respect your service in Vietnam, but I was talking about the contemporary operating environment (notice I mention the M4).It might seem stupid in Iraq or Afghanistan, but it wasn't stupid in the Viet Nam.
Single Six
New member
No combat vet here, just 23 years [and counting] of full-time LE. Naturally, I'm issued a rifle, but also a shotgun. The M4 is fine, but my problem is that the rifle is in my patrol car's trunk, while the blunderbuss is in the car with me, and thus more quickly accessed. If there's time, I'll take the Colt, but sometimes, there isn't time [my last armed encounter was a prime example]. There have been several occasions in my career where just the sound of me racking that first round into the chamber of the 870 was enough to end all hostilities. That suits me just fine; if I can do anything to solve a problem without actually pulling a trigger, wonderful. Of course, I know better than to depend on that happening every time, and I don't. Still, it's almost a given fact: When that unmistakable sound is heard, everyone in the vicinity knows that things just got SERIOUS.
Chuckusaret
Moderator
10mmAuto
Senior Member
I believe you and respect your service in Vietnam, but I was talking about the contemporary operating environment (notice I mention the M4).
What is a contemporary operating environment? I spent 24 years in the Army , of which about five years in combatunits in RVN, and never once heard that term used.
Frank Ettin
Administrator
I've kept this thread open for a while to see if it might morph into something more appropriate for T&T here -- but that never happened.
Our primary focus is personal self defense. If there are lessons to be learned from military applications that would be helpful to one interested in personal defense, fine. But nothing along those lines appears to be developing here.
Our primary focus is personal self defense. If there are lessons to be learned from military applications that would be helpful to one interested in personal defense, fine. But nothing along those lines appears to be developing here.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.