Road Rage - Stay in Car or Exit?

B

Bartholomew Roberts

Moderator
The discussion in this thread got me to thinking:http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=440836

In Texas, and some other states, Castle Doctrine laws extend to your vehicle. So by staying in your vehicle, you gain important legal protections as well as help deescalate many situations.

However, in that rare occasion where you do find someone who is intent on offering you serious bodily injury or worse, staying in the vehicle means you are immobile in a tiny box that doesn't offer much in the way of protection.

This lead me to wonder about whether there are any "bright line" rules regarding when you should stay in your vehicle vs. when you should exit the vehicle in a road rage type of situation.

I would propose the following rule for critique:

1. As long as your vehicle is not blocked in, you should stay in the vehicle. The reasoning being that the vehicle offers you more mobility so long as it is not blocked in, the legal cover of Castle Doctrine, and some very minimal protection.

I am also interested if anyone else has any suggestions on clear criteria to use to evaluate the best course of action in this type of scenario. I'm especially interested in a scenario where the vehicle is blocked in - at this point you seem to be trading mobility for Castle Doctrine - at what point do you give that up?
 
It's hard for me to imagine a scenario where my car is mobile and I would choose to exit. I would think you'd be hard pressed to avoid accusations of "voluntary participation". Even against a gun, I would think my best option for survival is LEAVE! Certainly, with a mobile vehicle against ANYTHING but a gun, leaving is the best option.

Also, it's hard to imagine how I would get into such a situation in the first place. Once again, it seems like I would have chosen to participate in some sort of altercation (such as in the other thread) and I would NOT choose to do so.


In a hypothetical situation where I am in an immobile car against an adversary threatening to use a firearm, I think you have little choice but to exit. Even giving up the castle doctrine, the assumption is virtually always that your escape must be reasonably possible to accomplish with complete safety to all innocents. The situation as described obviously makes that impossible so the question of castle doctrine protection is mute.

Being in an immobile vehicle with an adversary threatening deadly force with anything other than a firearm I think you're best to stay in the car, for many reasons. Some legal, some tactical.
 
A vehicle might not offer much protection but unless you have body armor you can quickly put on I would think you would be better off staying in the car.
 
atlctyslkr said:
A vehicle might not offer much protection but unless you have body armor you can quickly put on I would think you would be better off staying in the car.
Click to expand...

The conundrum is, do you want to be a stationary target protected by sheet metal or a mobile target protected by nothing? It's highly dependent on how one mentally constructs the situation.

Personally, removing all considerations except "you're being shot at and can't move the vehicle", I consider exiting the vehicle to be the highest probability for survival in most scenarios. At least I could move.


There are many variables though.

Is the vehicle likely to becomes unblocked in short order, such as at a stop light?
Where is the BG? If he's firing from the front, you have a lot of protection. If it's from the side, you have virtually none.
Can you effectively return fire without exiting and do you trust your choice of defense cartridge to make it through anything between you and the BG?
Who else is in the vehicle, if anyone, that you need to protect from incoming fire and where are they? Are they also armed? Are they mobile? Are they adults?

Many, many variables.
 
Getting out of the vehicle if your blocked in seems pretty bright to me. Then again, theres blocked in and then theres blocked in. You're not really blocked in at stop lights. I had a road rager come out of his car at a light at me for not lettin him out a few blocks earlier. I was armed by why stick around? I blazed a trail that clipped a pu truck bumper but I got away. Felt bad for the guy in the pu but I hadda do what I hadda do.
 
A vehicle doesn't offer much protection against bullets, but I can't help but think that most hard top vehicles with locked doors and rolled up windows will offer some degree of protection from impact weapons. So against a threat that isn't armed with gun, I would feel that staying in the car is the superior position, especially if I have a gun and could shoot him through my own car if needed.

About the only time I could see getting out would be if the car was immobilized and the bad guy had a gun (or the car was a convertible).
 
Edward429451 said:
You're not really blocked in at stop lights.
Click to expand...

See, that's part of the "mental construct". What if you're at a 3-lane light and you're in the middle, surrounded by 8 vehicles? You're not getting out of that unless you're Big Foot.


That's the major problem with these scenarios. I make an assumption, that I may not even be aware that I'm making, then I talk about the situation based on my assumption and you're making your own assumptions, that I'm not aware of and you may not be making consciously, and neither of us understands how the other can see it that way.:);)
 
I would consider my vehicle a means to create a solution even if someone is blocking me. It's just metal, plastic and rubber and bending, crushing and pushing it just costs money. I would prefer that cost (if it solves the problem) to anyone's life or health.
 
First thing you need to do is try to diffuse situations before they become road rage. This starts WITH YOUR BEHAVIOR. Realize there are crazy people in this world, and they are capable of crazy things. If somebody cuts you off, is driving like a moron, etc, LET IT GO! It will catch up to them. By flipping them off, cutting them off, etc... its just giving them a reason to target you. My dad told me to think "YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID" and let it go. Works wonders.

Second thing you should ALWAYS do when possible give yourself a way out. Don't tailgate, leave room at stop lights to maneuver, be aware of the cars around you. Obviously that isn't always possible but you can certainly leave a cars length in front of you when you stop. My Driver Ed teacher told me, If you cannot see the tires touching the ground on the car in front of you, you are WAY too close.

Third, If you are getting attacked.. STAY IN THE CAR! It provides a layer of protection against fists, knives, light projectiles. Obviously if someone has a gun it wont protect you, but at least you have mobility. That goes back to leaving yourself an out.

Getting out of the car accomplishes nothing. You are instigating a fight. You are eliminating your first layer of protection. You are eliminating your mobility. Leave room to maneuver the car, drive away, call 911, and drive to the police station, police car, hospital, landmark, etc..
 
all law aside, you shouldn't leave the vehicle on most occaisions. On some occaisons you might need to, but for the most part leaving the vehicle will escalate a road rage incident. calling police, leaving the situation, and waiting until you know you aren't being followed before stopping are good ideas
 
I agree with yougunz4life. Call 911, don't retaliate in any way & don't put others at risk by trying to out run him. Try to do your best avoidance moves & wait for help to arrive. If you can get in a position to take an exit ramp where he could not do it. If in a populated area drive to a police station (or known hang out of LE) & see if he is dumb enough to follow.
 
Peet, maybe you're right. I'm of the assumption that one should not let oneself get boxed in at lights. I suppose it could happen. If it appeared that no exit is possible (surrounded by semis & trash trucks)...that would be touchy. If one jumps out it may appear to witnesses that you're participatory and escalating it rather than trying to defuse the situation. Perhaps remaining in the vehicle (in low ready) would be the best option there.
 
I avoid road rage situations by simply staying in the right hand lane and letting the speeders fly on by me. Use turn signals, let folks in that need in.

I see this, a guy puts his turn sig on, car in other lane floors it to close the gap so the person has to wait and get behind that car. Or someone flys by me and gets in my lane hits the brakes hard and turns. :) I let them go, why worry? I will probably hear a call on them over the VFD radio :)

I stay out of the city, them city drivers are confused and run way too fast.

So to close, be polite, use turn signals, let speeders go by and stay out of the left or fast lane if possible. Ph and I forgot this, leave 5 or 10 minutes early so you will be on time and not have to speed.

If you carry, you dont really want to be involved in a road rage shooting regardless of who is at fault if it could have been avoided in any way.




I cant help it but when I read some of these scenarios I see a brain flash of a guy telling the draft recruiter he wants to go over there and kill, kill kill. :) Alice recently passed away but her resturant had a following.

Be nice to everyone no matter how they feel. Makes em feel silly after they cool off. :)
 
If you carry, you absolutely have to check the attitude at the door even if you feel you have personally been duped. Someone cutting you off is not worth the trouble. There was just another thread where this dude supposedly got cut off, flipped off the driver, got involved in a road rage incident, pulled over, the truck followed and he drew on the guys. Next think he knew he was in jail and charged with a number of crimes. That's NOT worth it.
 
If I'm driving down the road and normal road rage esclates into swerving toward me, slamming on brakes etc I'm stopping. I'll take my chances along side the road, not running 75 down the freeway putting others lifes in danger. While I'm pulling over though I'm calling 911 and explaining the situation to try and cover my rear the best I can and to get help coming.
 
I try to drive like I am on patrol, keep my head on a swivel, and keep an avenue of escape whenever possible. Not just for road ragers, but jackers, out of control vehicles, the odd homeless guy with a bucket of dirty water and handfull of newspapers, etc. I literally look at every driver I can see (go's with the job), and on the few occasions I have found myself the center of attention of an irate driver, I simply hold a cell phone up to my ear as if I'm already on the line with 911. With all the current "rage" legislation, it seems to get folks attention.
 
Situation where your car isn't mobile:

Somebody rear ends you when you pull up a bit short because traffic stopped short in front of you. Now they're mad and getting out of their car, and you're locked into traffic (say, middle of three lanes).

Another:

You swerve to avoid an object in the road, perhaps one that fell from the next vehicle up. In doing so, you lose control or simply hit another vehicle. Perhaps you are then turned around, or there is damage to the vehicle making it undrivable. The other driver is mad and getting out of their car.

Situation you're already out of the car and it's too late:

Somebody cuts you off, and impacts your bumper. They pull over into a parking lot and you follow, thinking it's a normal fender bender, the person will apologize and trade insurance information. You get out of the car to inspect the damage, and they get out of the car flippin' mad and ready to pound you into the pavement.

Point is, there are endless situations that seem innocuous at first, or that make single rules fail. Don't follow hardfast rules where good judgement and critical thinking will always get you where you need to be. Learn how to crack the nut, not when to use a nutcracker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top