You are jumping to conclusions, for example there are no options under 2k rds and no failures, or "no failures at all" which my 1911 and Walther fit into. I was voting for semi as my only and small revolver experience was rather short and dull, as you know. I chose "2k rds minor failure easy fix" because I have under 2k rounds and no failures that weren't ammo related.
Look. Let's stop and think for a minute about exactly how many options would need to be included to cover all the bases you'd like to see. You've mentioned sub-1000 and also "no failures so far" for each so that would be an extra 5 options, just for revolvers. So ten across the board. That makes 24 total!
Meanwhile let's think about what "2000 rds and no failures" tells us about the overall reliability of revolvers in the grand scheme of things and the whole question of "which is more reliable: wheelgun or bottom-feeder?" (all of which is not supposed to be a scientific project, just some interesting fun and discussion fodder).
It tells us very little. Just that the gun has not failed yet. So what? Not exactly earth-shattering, is it.
Now a gun that hits 10K without a failure, I'd have huge confidence in.
My poll also gives some idea of whether a failure is an easy or tough fix: another point of contention where owners spar over how easy it is to fix their gun compared to others...
So. In conclusion, the poll cannot cover all bases and nor should it.
It does, however, tell me that of the 34 revolver voters at the time of posting this answer, 25 had fired 10K without single issue.
That is useful information for me.
It also tells me that of the 9 that hadn't, 8 had easy fixes.
That is useful information for me.
So the only concession I'd offer to appease the masses is to add "up to " to the first 6 categories for both groups to allow for inclusion, but with 40 votes already in the bag it is a bit late to change the parameters, nor do I think it would add to the usefulness of the information there.
As I said before, you can call this a bad poll in the OP of your own version, citing that as a good reason to start another, if you wish.