Remington recall, has agreed to replace millions of trigg

This is one case where even though unsafe handling practices resulted in the death, the manufacturer bears complete responsibilty for producing a faulty design. The designer himself found the flaw way back in 1948 and the company refused to invest less than 6 cents per trigger to make it right.
 
I just read about it. Remington hasn't said what they are really going to do. I'm interested in seeing the answer to the problem.
 
Reminton Model 700 Recalled

The media did a great job investigating the story, but failed to mention how those 7.85 million owners are supposed to get their triggers replaced. An 800 number, email address, something to point us in the right direction would have helped. I don't trust Remington to call those who sent in their warranty registrations...
 
And recently they came out with a new trigger !!! Perhaps the design might be OK but they were so poorly made they had to recall them !! :rolleyes:

The older one ? I was watching a fairly new hunter unload his gun at the day's end . BANG ! and he immediately said " it went off , all by itself !! " And I said "BS I was watching you and you had your finger on the trigger when you shouldn't have .It's your fault not the guns ." I'll bet most of the time the same has happened -- by those think it's always someone else's fault !!
You can make Belk happy by buying his book but don't take it seriously !
 
The funny thing about all this is that Remington keeps claiming there is no problem with their guns, but they keep losing lawsuits and have even had the gun fail in court (unloaded).

Maybe they finally decided that the lawsuits were eating into their profits enough that they set aside nearly $30 million to fix the guns?
 
I guess my real question is "Why is a firearm the only product that must last forever without developing a mechanical problem?". Things wear out. Metal on metal eventually causes wear.
Having said that, I have always wondered why the rifle makers got away from the two stage triggers that were so popular in the 1800's to mid 1900's. I love my two stage Mauser triggers. The only trigger I will even shoot in an AR is a double stage. Double stage is much safer and allows more accurate shooting in practical applications. They are not the ideal bench rest trigger, but other than that, they are superior to single stage for the vast majority of applications.
 
''I guess my real question is "Why is a firearm the only product that must last forever without developing a mechanical problem?". Things wear out. Metal on metal eventually causes wear.''

In this case, because Rem knew of the defect from BEFORE releasing to the market and opted NOT to fix it and NOT fix it despite problems being reported.
 
Remington knew they did not have a perfect design. Fact is, no one had or has a perfect design. The inventor of the 700 trigger says he proposed a change to the trigger that would have made it safer. His design change was tested and was actually less safe than what it was supposed to improve. They had and have a failure rate that any manufacturer of anything would be thrilled to have. I have never seen the 700 malfunction, other than on you tube. I have seen model 70's fire many times when safety was flipped off. Why is the 700 and issue and the 70 not an issue?
I am not aware of anything mechanical that can perform forever without maintenance.
 
mine's not prone to drop fire and seeing as I inherited it from my dad... I'll probably not partake in this recall... sure took them long enough to get around to it though.
 
I said "BS I was watching you and you had your finger on the trigger when you shouldn't have .It's your fault not the guns ." I'll bet most of the time the same has happened -- by those think it's always someone else's fault !!

Remington has had over 10,000 complaints about defective rifles since the 1940's. And untold thousands who have simply replaced their triggers without contacting Remington.

Have lost or settled out of court on over 75 lawsuits.

Over 2 dozen dead and over 100 injures.

I suppose it is all the fault of those gun owners. How many complaints has Winchester had about guns firing on their own? How many times has Ruger been sued and how many Savage rifles have fired on their own and killed or wounded people?

Why is it that only those who buy Remington products have these problems?
 
hmmm latest from remington on this matter.


http://www.remington.com/pages/news...s/remington correction of cnbc reporting.aspx
Yesterday afternoon, CNBC erroneously reported that Remington Arms was recalling 7.85 million rifles. This report was fundamentally inaccurate and, once again, CNBC did not comply with the most basic tenet of reporting – fact checking. Even a cursory review of the court filings would have revealed CNBC’s errors. That said, other news sources picked-up and repeated the misinformation about the proposed settlement. In response, the Plaintiffs’ counsel immediately took steps to correct CNBC’s inaccuracies by clarifying the terms of the proposed settlement in their own press release, which, in part, stated:



These settlements are not recalls.
These settlements are not any admission that the products are defective or unsafe.

This economic settlement provides an avenue for consumers, who have certain Remington rifles, to voluntarily have a new trigger installed. As noted by the Plaintiffs, the benefits provided by the settlement will not be in place until after court approval.



Remington is issuing this press release today because it is important that the terms of the proposed economic settlement be accurately described, as Remington does not want its customers to be confused or misled.



Further, and contrary to CNBC’s story, it is undisputed that the Remington Model 700 is the best-selling American-made, bolt-action rifle of all time. The Model 700 has also been and continues to be the tactical sniper rifle of choice for the U.S. armed forces and special operators and is widely used by state and federal law enforcement agencies.
so it's not a recall in the same sense that glock has never had a recall. you can voluntarily get a new trigger if you want, but if you kill someone they're still not liable.
 
Satisfied with mine

Remington posted a recall on their site earlier this year. I checked my serial number on their site as it qualified. Followed the instructions, they mailed a box, send the rifle back on their nickel, and got it back in three months with a new trigger on their nickel. Shot it last week and it performed flawlessly.
 
Let's not forget the 597 .17 hmr debacle by Remington. I paid $465 for mine when they first come out. Called and emailed trying to get the gun worked on because of FTE. Never got anywhere with CS and then I find the recall and buy back notice on the internet. Call to customer service and was told that $250 was maximum I would get and it was a coupon towards the purchase of another Remington. I washed my hands of Remington that day.
 
Back
Top