Remington Model 8/81
- Thread starter markr
- Start date
Mike Irwin
Staff
"Improved" in this sense doesn't mean much.
Essentially, all of the changes were cosmetic -- changing the shape of the stock, primarily.
To the best of my knowledge, there were no mechanical alterations at all.
I purchased an 81 some years ago in .300 Savage.
I've still not shot it.
Essentially, all of the changes were cosmetic -- changing the shape of the stock, primarily.
To the best of my knowledge, there were no mechanical alterations at all.
I purchased an 81 some years ago in .300 Savage.
I've still not shot it.
I believe it is true the changes were mostly cosmetic. The Model 8 had a straight grip, the Model 81, a pistol grip. Also, the .300 Savage, which appeared around 1920 or 21 I think, was offered in the Model 81. It was not available in the Model 8. The Model 8 probably commands more money, since it was a John Browning design and the first successful semi-auto sporting rifle. He patented the design in 1900. Being a Browning design, it is built like a tank and I think most any one you find will function well. I have a Model 81 in .300 Savage and I have shot it many times. Being a long-recoil semi-auto, the whole barrel assembly recoils in order to open the bolt and cycle the action. The bolt lugs lock in an extension of the barrel rather than in receiver mortises. The receiver, which therefore does not have to withstand the pressure of the round, is of thin metal. This is a workable design which has since been used in more modern arms. I think the current Browning Sporting BAR, and maybe the LAR, use this locking method.
My gun functions well and is fairly accurate, but it certainly won't shame any bolt action rifles. It likes to toss the very hot empties straight up and back on my nose. The original butt plate is steel, and though you may not think of the .300 Savage as being a heavy recoil number, the Model 81 thumps you real good. If you intend to hunt, the Model 81 in .300 Savage would be far superior to a Model 8 in .30 Remington, which has ballistics comparable to the .30-30 Win.
My gun functions well and is fairly accurate, but it certainly won't shame any bolt action rifles. It likes to toss the very hot empties straight up and back on my nose. The original butt plate is steel, and though you may not think of the .300 Savage as being a heavy recoil number, the Model 81 thumps you real good. If you intend to hunt, the Model 81 in .300 Savage would be far superior to a Model 8 in .30 Remington, which has ballistics comparable to the .30-30 Win.
Jim Watson
New member
As said, there is little if any mechanical difference. The 8 has a straight grip butt and a bit slimmer foreend. than the 81 which kind of bulked up. The 81 is available in .300 Savage.
I don't know ammo availability, but I would feel safest with a .35 Remington or .300 Savage to actually shoot. Ammunition for the original .25, .30, and .32 Remington are kind of scarce.
I don't know ammo availability, but I would feel safest with a .35 Remington or .300 Savage to actually shoot. Ammunition for the original .25, .30, and .32 Remington are kind of scarce.
Jim Watson
New member
.35 Remington is not a .30-30 derivative and .30-30 brass not usable.
It is a rimless case with its own nonstandard head diameter.
It is a rimless case with its own nonstandard head diameter.
Mike Irwin
Staff
" Also, the .300 Savage, which appeared around 1920 or 21 I think, was offered in the Model 81."
The .300 was first offered by Savage in 1920, but it wasn't chambered in the Model 81 until about 1938.
The .25, .30, and .32 Remington cartridges are effectively obsolete, but brass can be found or even manufactured.
Loading data is also commonly available, either for the actual cartridge, or by using .25-35, .30-30, or .32 Winchester Special data, respectively.
The .300 was first offered by Savage in 1920, but it wasn't chambered in the Model 81 until about 1938.
The .25, .30, and .32 Remington cartridges are effectively obsolete, but brass can be found or even manufactured.
Loading data is also commonly available, either for the actual cartridge, or by using .25-35, .30-30, or .32 Winchester Special data, respectively.
Jim Watson
New member
Strangely enough, Midway is listing .25 and .32 Remington - backorder from QCC - but not .30.
Yes, you can make them out of .30-30 by turning it rimless and die forming.
I'd still just look for a .35 or .300.
A friend bought a .303 Savage rifle largely because it came with a good stock of ammo and brass he could use with his first .303.
Yes, you can make them out of .30-30 by turning it rimless and die forming.
I'd still just look for a .35 or .300.
A friend bought a .303 Savage rifle largely because it came with a good stock of ammo and brass he could use with his first .303.
Graf's usually has the ammo. They are currently out. I would contact them about backorder status.
http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/11930
http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/11930
Mike Irwin
Staff
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough in my reply.
The .25, .30, and .32 Remingtons are rimless analogs to the .25-35, .30-30, and .32 Winchester Special cartridges.
Dimensions are slightly different, but you can make rimless cases by cutting the rim off of any of the rimmed Winchester cases, cutting a new extractor groove, and resizing and fireforming.
The .35 Remington case design, as noted, is a developmental one-off, not based on a previous cartridge, and not really used for much of anything after.
It is kind of odd that Winchester never did develop a .35 caliber variant cartridge for the Model 1894.
They did offer the .35 Winchester Center Fire starting in 1903, but it was a much larger cartridge chambered in the Model 1895 rifle.
Oddly enough, a .35 caliber wildcat version based on the .30-30, first appearing around the same time as the .35 Winchester, was a fairly popular option for salvaging shot out Model 1894s.
I don't think it's any accident that Remington's single viable survivor of the Winchester-Remington cartridge wars is the one that didn't have a Winchester counterpart in the smaller, handier 1894 action.
The .25, .30, and .32 Remingtons are rimless analogs to the .25-35, .30-30, and .32 Winchester Special cartridges.
Dimensions are slightly different, but you can make rimless cases by cutting the rim off of any of the rimmed Winchester cases, cutting a new extractor groove, and resizing and fireforming.
The .35 Remington case design, as noted, is a developmental one-off, not based on a previous cartridge, and not really used for much of anything after.
It is kind of odd that Winchester never did develop a .35 caliber variant cartridge for the Model 1894.
They did offer the .35 Winchester Center Fire starting in 1903, but it was a much larger cartridge chambered in the Model 1895 rifle.
Oddly enough, a .35 caliber wildcat version based on the .30-30, first appearing around the same time as the .35 Winchester, was a fairly popular option for salvaging shot out Model 1894s.
I don't think it's any accident that Remington's single viable survivor of the Winchester-Remington cartridge wars is the one that didn't have a Winchester counterpart in the smaller, handier 1894 action.
Mike Irwin
Staff
Surprisingly heavy, too.
Do any of you guys have experience using, or casting your own cast boolits for .35 Remington ? At the pressures and velocities it shoots at it seems a good candidate. I would imagine gas checks would be neccessary.
On a another note, I've found a Model 8 in .35 that I am considering.
On a another note, I've found a Model 8 in .35 that I am considering.
bamaranger
New member
+1
Good for you.
I've always thought the 8/81's were interesting rifles, but have never owned one. REad a story somewhere where LE and the Tx Rangers were very big on them when they first came out. Ranger came to a unit meeting with one bought new, and the meeting adjourned and the whole outfit went and bought one. Wish I could remember where I read that.
The .30 and .35 Rem ctgs were popular deer rounds in the autos little brother the 14/141 pumps with many of my kin.
Good for you.
I've always thought the 8/81's were interesting rifles, but have never owned one. REad a story somewhere where LE and the Tx Rangers were very big on them when they first came out. Ranger came to a unit meeting with one bought new, and the meeting adjourned and the whole outfit went and bought one. Wish I could remember where I read that.
The .30 and .35 Rem ctgs were popular deer rounds in the autos little brother the 14/141 pumps with many of my kin.
I have a Remington Model 81 in .30 Remington. It was made in February 1947 and originally belonged to my grandfather.
I killed the first deer I ever shot with a rifle with it when I was 14 in 1977. Before that I had used a shotgun. I have killed several more deer with it since then.
Ammo was difficult to find for it even back then. Every time I found a box I would buy it. When I was 16 I got an RCBS Rockchucker kit for Christmas. I got some .30 Remington dies so that I could reload for it.
I went into Howard Bros. in Monroe, LA in 1985 and they had some Wichester Super X .30 Reminton in the yellow box. It was priced at $4.11 a box. The guy asked me did I want a box. I asked him how many boxes they had. He said that he had ten. I told him that I would take them all. Two hundred rounds out the door for $43.16. I still have two boxes of it.
I found two hundred new .30 Remington brass cases on clearance last year at a local shop that had never had any before. I guess I am set for brass now.
My Model 81 is still a good shooting rifle and in the right terrain, I don't hesitate to hunt with it even today.
I killed the first deer I ever shot with a rifle with it when I was 14 in 1977. Before that I had used a shotgun. I have killed several more deer with it since then.
Ammo was difficult to find for it even back then. Every time I found a box I would buy it. When I was 16 I got an RCBS Rockchucker kit for Christmas. I got some .30 Remington dies so that I could reload for it.
I went into Howard Bros. in Monroe, LA in 1985 and they had some Wichester Super X .30 Reminton in the yellow box. It was priced at $4.11 a box. The guy asked me did I want a box. I asked him how many boxes they had. He said that he had ten. I told him that I would take them all. Two hundred rounds out the door for $43.16. I still have two boxes of it.
I found two hundred new .30 Remington brass cases on clearance last year at a local shop that had never had any before. I guess I am set for brass now.
My Model 81 is still a good shooting rifle and in the right terrain, I don't hesitate to hunt with it even today.
Mike Irwin
Staff
"I believe .35 Rem and .300 Savage are the only two calibers still commercially available"
From the big name makers, that is correct. .30 Remington is still loaded by Precision Cartridge.
From the big name makers, that is correct. .30 Remington is still loaded by Precision Cartridge.