DC. If you are content with a 770, then that is all that matters. If you came to this site to fish for praise for any rifle you will be disappointed. It doesn't matter what rifle you mention, someone will bash it.
Your 770 meets your needs, be content with that. Any opinion you find here and $3.00 will get you a small coffee at Starbucks.
I personally wouldn't want any rifle Rem makes since they stopped importing the 798. I have owned MDL 700's and they were perfectly serviceable, if cheap and overpriced. I have moved on from drilled out bar stock, fused bolts, and washered recoil lugs, and that's Remingtons top product.
If all you want from your rifle is to put meat in the freezer, and the 770 works for you, great. Many at this forum have no use for a rifle with a pressed barrel, that can't be replaced, myself amoung them.
Personally I consider myself a true rifle snob. I own Weatherbys, Coopers and couple of Rugers. Their receivers are machined from solid billets, have integral recoil lugs, and the bolts, handle and all are machined from a solid billet. I want these properties in my rifles, because I reload for cartridges most consider grossly over powered, and in my retirement I can now afford them.
My first magnum centerfire rifle was a MDL 700, 7mag, I bought in 1976, and had no problems with. My uncle, a minister and gunsmith, thought drilled bar stock was on same moral level as the slaughter of the unborn. I rather resented that. I thought my new magnum rifle was very sexy. I will not bash them though. If they work for you and you're content, that is all that matters.