Reloaders -- BEWARE!

""That's why they make 'standards weights', traceable to NBS standards. They're not that expensive.""

During the changes in the world of metrology (measurement technology) NBS (National Bureau of Standards) is long gone, consumed by change. NBS morphed into NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). :)

Ron
 
I've accumulated 4 sets of check weights. One is Jap and in hard case complete with tweezers to handle them. They aren't cheap junk. To a point uniformity is
more important than actual weight. The amount +or- you are going to be off isn't in capability of the scale to define. I know a guy that bought a heavy barrel
H&R Handi gun 223. His first rifle other than 22s. Decked it out with a big BSA
varible. Bought Lee loading set. He ask if I would stop by and check him out on
setting dies and walk him through a few. When I got there he was setting at the
kitchen table with Lee beam scale. He had a couple boxes of Sierra 55gr bullets
and was busy sorting out the "bad" bullets that didn't 0 out on his scale. He got
perturbed when I told him his new scales weren't up to the task and was sure that Sierra bullets were hold to higher specs than he could measure. Also his new rifle and scope rig were not in the class to take advantage of micro measurements. As in anything else tolerance is a big part of loading. You have
to ask yourself how much precision is practical for the task at hand. For my HV
bolt actions I weigh and trickle each one. For LV rifle and handguns, I drop the
charges and check every 10th one. Final check with light to ensure no double charges or short loads.
 
A near-by reloader was having trouble with his Ohaus 10-10 so I suggested he bring the scales for a test run. He thought the Starrett 12" machinist lever was over kill and the note pad was not necessary but when finished the platform used with the scale was level.

I do not want for scale parts; I used my beams on his housing base with no improvement and then I replaced his base. He sent the scales back to Ohaus, they made the repairs. At the next gun show he purchases another 10-10 with a RCBS label.

F. Guffey
 
I was a junior in high school when I started handloading metallic. Mo mentor, no internet and a Speer#11 was my only source of information beyond whatever Guns & Ammo might say in any issue at the time. I loaded .38 Special and I didn't own a scale. I had a full set of Lee dippers and the Lee "slide rule" decoder thing to tell me what charge weight of which powder I was getting. This method of powder handling came because I was on an absolute shoe-string budget. It was 3 or 4 years later when I purchased my first scale, and even then it was the very low-cost (but accurate!) Lee scale.

My next scale was an ultra-low quality Frankford Arsenal digital and it sucked out loud. Rather than dink around with the check weight that came with it, I kept a 55 grain .224" SP bullet (a particular one, not grabbed randomly from a box) and once that junk scale warmed up, I would check it often with that one particular rifle bullet. When it read "55.1gr" then I knew the scale was working at that moment.

I truly have no idea if that bullet weighed 55.1 grains, but when my craptastic scale said that it did, I went forward in the process. And I loaded probably ten thousand rounds of ammo across numerous calibers doing that and I had enormous success doing so.

It didn't matter what the bullet weighed, it only mattered that it always weighed the same. All the loads I built and fine-tuned and referred back to later to re-create all ran wonderfully. They may not have been exactly the weight that I recorded on each box of ammo or in my reloading log, but every time I set up to make that load, the charge weight was the same as the one that had worked.
 
Since you brought this up . . .

I will say that in order for my electronic scale to stabilize I have to turn off the overhead fan.

Just sayin'

Life is good.
Prof Young
 
The joke I heard was a physicist, a mathematician and an engineer were taken out to the 50 yard line at local football stadium. At the end zone was the college's cheerleaders, and they were told that they can run from the 50 yard line advancing half the distance to the goal line each minute. If they make it to the goal line they will be able to date one of the cheerleaders. The physicist and the mathematician scoffed, but the engineer started running. The mathematician yelled at the engineer "What are you doing you will never reach the goal line?" The engineer replied "I can get close enough for all practical purposes."
This is funny only to those who are familiar with Zeno’s paradox (5th century BC). By the way this was attempted in a math class at the U of Chicago in the late forties....this is where the joke comes from.
 
...and most people don't know the reason you can reach and pass the goal line (or that Achilles can pass the tortoise) is that consecutive halved numbers make what is called a converging series, and as soon as enough time has passed for them to converge with the goal line or the position of the tortoise, you are, thereafter moving past it. You have to remember not only the distance but the time required to cover it is halved with each step, too, and for the goal to be a sort of barrier, time would have to stop passing at the instant that time and distance converged to zero.


Prof Young,

Is your scale battery-operated or plug-in? If the latter, a noise filter can help, like the ones built into computer UPS units. Just use an old UPS with the dead battery removed as an extension cord for it to plug into. If it's battery-powered you may need a Faraday cage for it. I've had some limited luck just spray painting the inside of the plastic chassis with shielding paint and running a ground wire from it, but not all interference is amenable to that treatment.
 
Back
Top