Redding Dies

kilotanker22

New member
So today I went to buy a set of dies for my 6.5 Creedmoor. I normally use RCBS dies, but the LGS did not have any. All he had were Redding dies for that caliber. They were $10 more, but they seem to be made very well. In fact I think their adjustment screws are better.

Overall I think I like the Redding dies very well.

You guys think that the Redding dies are worth the extra coin for future purchases?
 
Nope...

I've found no real advantage over one die maker to the next.
They all do the same thing.

Love auctions and flea markets.. Lol
 
I like the Redding S bushing dies for FL sizing, never much if any runout, but a RCBS body die and a Lee Collet neck die does just as well. I have a pair of RCBS X dies that do a good job also. I'm with std7mag, pick the color you like best they all work or they would be out of business pretty fast these days
 
As 7mag has said "They all do the same thing".

He must feel the same way about guns -- they all do the same thing.
So the $166 pump gun is just as good as a Browning BPS!

I will pick the Redding dies before all others, second is RCBS. I like
the quality and finish of those dies.
 
I look at two characteristics of dies, how well they do their job and how easy they are to use to make accurate ammunition. I tend to use Redding dies when I want to be a little more accurate, I find the bushing dies and micrometer seating dies to be easier to adjust than the other dies I own.
 
The pointy end of the bullet comes out of the thingy where the hole is. Right Jaguar? Lol
I've seen my wife out shoot guys to 600 yards with her Rossi R243 that i got used for $150.
The guys had close to $6K in each of their rifles.
So, yeah.
 
Redding s dies and especially the comp seating die (even without the micrometer adj). The comp seater is expensive, while the foerster is better deal. The RCBS comp seater does not provide the same benefit.

Either way, a good comp seater is well worth it imo.
 
I saw a off the shelf Ruger precision rifle using factory ammo shoot a 594 aggregate last spring in a 300 yard match. There were some Pelican cases at that match that cost more than that fellas rifle

Like I said I love the S dies for the bushings, but any other brand of bushing dies would probably give the same results. Or just use a Lee collet neck die and FL resize every third firing
 
Last edited:
I like Redding bushing dies, but in non competition dies, they all seem about equal to me. With the exception if Lee which is functional but rough.
 
You guys think that the Redding dies are worth the extra coin for future purchases?

I have C&H/El Monte dies in fiber boxes, I also have Herter dies in fiber boxes: the age and design of the box has nothing to do with my perception of the dies. I can measure the ability of the die to return the case to minimum length/ full length size. A case when sized in a 30/06 die should have .125" case head protrusion from the die if the shell holder has a deck height of .125". And then there is 'verifying' the die.

A reloader should be able to verify the chamber length from the shoulder/datum to the bolt face. It seems most reloaders believe measuring the length of the chamber is something others do. I find measuring the length of the chamber is the easiest method and or technique.

F. Guffey
 
Zeke: What makes you feel that the RCBS comp does not work?

I have both Forster and the RCBS, both work, the RCBS is more convenient with the side slot for the bullet. The holder seems to work the same and it does both 06 and 308 which the Forster is specific for.

Redding has been listed as a go to by some I respect, I am good with RCBS but alwyas intersted.
 
RC20-Wasn't trying to imply they didn't work, but as usual am not explaining enough. The RCBS is more convenient to place the bullet in the die. However the main benefit i get from the comp dies are seating bullets without noticeable wobble. In highly unscientific testing with the one caliber (6.5x55) that i bought the RCBS comp seater, it did not seat the bullets tried as concentric as the Redding die bought afterward. Granted this test did not include multiple calibers, types of brass, bullets, sd or es. And the test for concentricticity (made up word?) involved rolling the round on piece of flat surfaced marble. There was noticeable wobble with the bullets seated with the RCBS, followed by the noticeably better Foerster, which was closely followed by the Redding (no discernible wobble).

However you are right, different people may have differing purposes or experiences. The tolerances on the RCBS appeared looser.
 
Last edited:
I like the RCBS seaters myself, I have on in .223. Less piched fingers. I was disappointed they did not have a off the shelf one for 6.0 CM. I went with Forster instead, it was on sale and I have one in .308 that works well. Sidenote is that I use the .308 to seat my .260 Rem bullets and get less than .001 avg runout numbers
 
All mine are Redding. I use the FL sizing die and Compitition Seating Die. I also use the carbide sizing button for neck sizing. I have had great success with them. I can't compair them to others because Redding is all I have used. No reason to change.
 
Redding dies are better designed and better finished - and I’ve never had to return a set due to faulty workmanship. Can’t say that about RCBS dies.....


.
 
Redding dies are better designed and better finished

I never paid much attention but just looked and you are right. On the sizing dies the knurling is more crisp and the lettering is sharper. A noticeable difference in fit and finished if you look close
 
Would add that am not brand loyal. Differing makers have certain features/attributes of specific dies that i prefer. As an example prefer the Redding comp seater, RCBS sb dies and Lee sizer dies for standard lever action calibers.
 
I use RCBS for SB dies, Redding for pistol and revolver in my progressive press and Forster for rifle in my single stage press. Not saying one brand is better than any other. This is just my preference.
 
Back
Top