I don't scope my pistol-caliber levers, and the Henry is way too heavy and clunky in style to me, so another +1 for the 92s. I've shot a variety of them for 45 years--owning mostly clones (Rossi and Browning). All the 92s are nice, just depends on your budget which one to get: whatever matches your $ will be hard to miss with, literally and figuratively.
Between (barely*) the Rossis and current Winchesters in price (*some matching Wins in $) are the Italian-made Chiappa/Armi Sport 1892s marketed by Cimarron, Taylor's and Legacy Sport (LSI). They're perhaps the most correct cosmetically to the originals--with no add-on safeties like modern-day Rossis and Wins--and have great fit and finish. Some have reported issues with a few of the small internal bits, others not.
Also in the same rough price category as (some less than) the Italians would be a Browning 92 (B92)--"used" only, as they've been out of production for 20+ years.- but made by the same Miroku, Japan plant as the modern-day Winchester 92s. Any Miroku is absolute tops in overall quality of fit and finish. The current ones irk some with their rebounding hammer (like all Wins in the past 25+ years)--some experiencing light primer strikes--and safety set up--and view these things as blemishes on the original design rergardless. For others, these "features" are no bother. Being a newbie to levers, the OP may not notice or care about these. These aspects are "correctible" to Browning (and original Win) type configuration, but obviously voiding of warranty if permanently messed with. Ditto Rossis. I never had to send one of my Rossis--all pre safety--back anyway, so that aspect is seldom an issue with me. If a lever is going to fail due to a manufacturing/assembly/quality issue, my experience is it will usually surface soon after purchase and not so much down the line.
My .02.