I have a question. Not a problem, necessarily, but a question nevertheless.
By far the largest number of people corresponding through the forums of thefiringline.com are using handles or nicknames. A very, very small minority use their real names. I'm one of those.
I'm curious as to why this is. First, however, please don't misunderstand -- this is not in the form of a "flame," nor is it in any way meant to be derogatory. I just find it a bit strange to be dealing with many people, on a myriad of often critical or technical subjects, without having much of an idea of whom I'm really dealing with.
I spent a bunch of years "hanging out" on the CompuServe Firearms Forum, where nicknames were specifically forbidden. You always knew exactly to whom you were speaking, and vice versa. I suppose I grew used to this, it having been my norm for some ten years, and now find it a bit weird talking to "Bluejay" and "Magpie" rather than Bob Jones or Margaret Smith.
It's our strict policy through our website, where we deal with hundreds of people each month, to only provide answers to questions posed there by people using their names, not handles. I've always figured if I'm going to take the time to try and explain to someone how to fix something or correct a firearms problem they're experiencing, it's not unreasonable to want to know exactly to whom I'm speaking. After all, they have no doubt whatsoever as to my true identity.
So, in a nutshell, I'd be curious to hear responses on this subject. Am I just being weird and combative, or do I have a point? And, if I do, do you think wearing a hat will cover it?
Regards,
----Mac Scott
By far the largest number of people corresponding through the forums of thefiringline.com are using handles or nicknames. A very, very small minority use their real names. I'm one of those.
I'm curious as to why this is. First, however, please don't misunderstand -- this is not in the form of a "flame," nor is it in any way meant to be derogatory. I just find it a bit strange to be dealing with many people, on a myriad of often critical or technical subjects, without having much of an idea of whom I'm really dealing with.
I spent a bunch of years "hanging out" on the CompuServe Firearms Forum, where nicknames were specifically forbidden. You always knew exactly to whom you were speaking, and vice versa. I suppose I grew used to this, it having been my norm for some ten years, and now find it a bit weird talking to "Bluejay" and "Magpie" rather than Bob Jones or Margaret Smith.
It's our strict policy through our website, where we deal with hundreds of people each month, to only provide answers to questions posed there by people using their names, not handles. I've always figured if I'm going to take the time to try and explain to someone how to fix something or correct a firearms problem they're experiencing, it's not unreasonable to want to know exactly to whom I'm speaking. After all, they have no doubt whatsoever as to my true identity.
So, in a nutshell, I'd be curious to hear responses on this subject. Am I just being weird and combative, or do I have a point? And, if I do, do you think wearing a hat will cover it?
Regards,
----Mac Scott