I don't know how many people think of the PLCAA as a law protecting gun rights, but it is. According to Wikipedia's description of the demise of Intratec "It went out of business in 2001 under pressure of lawsuits and the anti-gun movement.
The anti-gun movement saw this as a way to enact a sort of gun control without having to enact laws. At first it appeared to be a succesful strategy.
Beretta was sued by New York City and Washington D.C. and the suits were dismissed under the PLCCA. I don't know how many other gun manufacturers were sued and found relief under the PLCAA.
Last week The Brady Center lost another PLCAA suit:
http://www.nssfblog.com/brady-cente...=feed&************=Feed:+NSSFBlog+(NSSF+Blog)
More and more precedents are being set supporting PLCAA, so it is a win for gun rights
The anti-gun movement saw this as a way to enact a sort of gun control without having to enact laws. At first it appeared to be a succesful strategy.
Beretta was sued by New York City and Washington D.C. and the suits were dismissed under the PLCCA. I don't know how many other gun manufacturers were sued and found relief under the PLCAA.
Last week The Brady Center lost another PLCAA suit:
http://www.nssfblog.com/brady-cente...=feed&************=Feed:+NSSFBlog+(NSSF+Blog)
More and more precedents are being set supporting PLCAA, so it is a win for gun rights