Alabama Shooter
New member
No, I don't much see the point. If I wanted to I could make a better gun in my shop far more cheaply with less resources without drawing attention to myself.
We also care about the quality and reliability of our firearms. Imagine if there was no "cost" to print as many guns as you wanted and the materials needed to feed the printer were uncontrolled and very plentiful?
but in theory does not apply to transfer of the files / knowledge to "US Persons".
I wholeheartedly hope that the knowledge spreads beyond any one person, organization, or government's ability to censor it.
Alabama Shooter said:Will not be. The materials are expensive. I can make several zip guns for less than half of what the cost of the printing stock would be.
Some time in the next ten years they might have a cheaper method in place, just not now.
Sure, why not - figure you never know so might as well get it before they ban it - like they did.
The point you seem to be missing is that these can be mass produced and there will be nothing the government can do since the plans have already been published.
I'm sure I can make a working gun as well, but I'm sure my skill level is higher than the average thug.
The biggest threat is that "bad guys" could conceivably either buy (more likely steal) a 3D printer and create a weapon that is very cheap, disposable, and completely untraceable. There are no serial numbers to trace, not rifling to match ballistics if the gun is easily destroyed or melted down, and they can print more any time they want or need.
I'm sure I can make a working gun as well, but I'm sure my skill level is higher than the average thug.