I’ve seen reviewers mention issues I’ve never seen before.
Besides the fact that the feel of the firearm is subjective, all of these reviews are generally samples of one. Within just this thread we have one person who had very different experiences with a pistol based on just the change of the trigger shape. I myself have never handled a P365 with a trigger that I would compare to a PPQ, curved trigger or not. Does that mean we’re all lying? Or maybe delusional? Or maybe the simple answer is not all of these experiences are the same.
The prevailing wisdom seems to be reviewers are either paid shills or haters. If they give a positive review it must be because they were paid or given access for free, whereas if they give a negative review they must hate that brand or just want to generate clicks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Besides the fact that the feel of the firearm is subjective, all of these reviews are generally samples of one. Within just this thread we have one person who had very different experiences with a pistol based on just the change of the trigger shape. I myself have never handled a P365 with a trigger that I would compare to a PPQ, curved trigger or not. Does that mean we’re all lying? Or maybe delusional? Or maybe the simple answer is not all of these experiences are the same.
The prevailing wisdom seems to be reviewers are either paid shills or haters. If they give a positive review it must be because they were paid or given access for free, whereas if they give a negative review they must hate that brand or just want to generate clicks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk