Considering the source, not all that amazing. And not so much "inaccuracy" as "propaganda," i.e. disinformation.
I'm going to have to take issue with G-ManX regarding ignorance. "Ignorant" means "unknowing." The Hollywood types are not unknowing. They know about the Second Amendment, and they know we can't stroll into a Wal-Mart and walk out with a machine gun. So their intentional misrepresentations of reality are not "ignorant," they are malicious misrepresentations.
Remember Hanlon's Razor? "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"[ I ascribe to that theory. In this case, I don't believe the misrepresentations can be adequately explained by stupidity (or ignorance). I think we have to accept that they are due to malice, not ignorance.
Aguila Blanca,
Maybe you missed my additional post, but this will now be the second time you’ve got this wrong. You can take issue all you want, but that will not change the fact that you fail to understand the fundamental concept as I have meticulously spent time explaining it to you.
Nevertheless, I will attempt one more time...
The problem at its core is that you have taken my post and created rules for everyone which insists the gun scene was created either by “ignorance” or “intent”, and that we must choose one or the other.
However, I never presented my comment to this forum as a question of “ignorance” over “intent”. I simply stated that one (“ignorance”) led to the other (“intent”). I then clarified as much in a follow-up post to you.
Yet you chose to disregard that and continue to hijack my comments by insisting everyone must still make this choice based on your personal rule and inability to comprehend my comment. Since I am the owner of my content, I know the intent of what I wrote. I can assure you once again, you have it absolutely wrong.
We know the overall liberal anti-gun Hollywood mentality is caused by their lack of comprehension, understanding, and failed knowledge of this Nation’s history - which led to the need and right to bear arms to begin with. Their inability to grasp such a necessary right to maintain a free state can be summed up as nothing other than sheer “IGNORANCE” caused by misinformation.
Thereafter such “IGNORANCE” is still the reason they choose to “INTENTIONALLY” create deceptive gun scenes in support of their false anti-gun narrative. Simply put, one does lead to the other. Or in other words, “ignorance” does lead to “intentionally” deceptive acts.
Just because certain knowledge is available to all persons, does not confirm they are in command of it. A person or group can still be “ignorant” when they chose not to become intimate with such extraneous knowledge which might otherwise prevent them from supporting such bad causes.
However, this lack of knowledge or “ignorance” in such matters in no way hinders their ability to still “intentionally” carry out deceptive acts in support of such misplaced causes, especially when it comes to the anti-gun agenda.