therealdeal
New member
AH, you know where you can shove you 1 line answers that do nothing right? you had absolutely nothing to say last time either. I was starting a discussion on this forum. it was pretty much a rhetorical question+some of us enjoy the forum not just to get answers from 'the internet'. not surprising you took 'newness' the derogatory way also; thats why I added the bit in parathenses after during its original post. I said that out of respect for the LEO's that have already retired or have much more experience than me. that doesn't mean I am green, and I do not recall being overly repetitive about it. I will never have anything to prove to you. you can continue to try and get that from the people in your life which I am sure ou do.
wc145, I read your site+thanx. all that says is as of 7/09 the declaration, letter of authority or whatever is no longer accepted which I gather it used to be as I said. I know for a fact they flew armed offduty(as much as 'for a fact' I can get without eyeballing anyone actually boarding a plane. if you don't want to believe me thats pretty much on you. it didn't feel right to me, and thats why I didn't bother trying the one time I had the opportunity to. I explained myself after your original post but I guess you're still having trouble grasping it which is fine. show me in black&white where it says feds are ok no questions asked. I know marshalls are but what I was speaking about I wasn't trying to say LEOSA grants the right which you eluded to - that happens to be the same reason why I am respecting amtrak. I am federal law enforcement wc145 but I dont see why that would matter. many feds dont use planes for official duties but maybe you're right. personally I didnt want to mention the fed thing which I have in my other posts/threads because of trolls like AH(however your post was before his so I figured I'd let you know since you said 'feds can no questions asked') his question had already been answered before he asked it
wc is fine but when trolls like AH show up its time to just close the thread. I dont need the fun of TFL turning into he said she said and faxing documents to please his mind. what do you do Sir? whats your profession? are you an LEO? you shouldnt be judegmental AH.
wc145, I read your site+thanx. all that says is as of 7/09 the declaration, letter of authority or whatever is no longer accepted which I gather it used to be as I said. I know for a fact they flew armed offduty(as much as 'for a fact' I can get without eyeballing anyone actually boarding a plane. if you don't want to believe me thats pretty much on you. it didn't feel right to me, and thats why I didn't bother trying the one time I had the opportunity to. I explained myself after your original post but I guess you're still having trouble grasping it which is fine. show me in black&white where it says feds are ok no questions asked. I know marshalls are but what I was speaking about I wasn't trying to say LEOSA grants the right which you eluded to - that happens to be the same reason why I am respecting amtrak. I am federal law enforcement wc145 but I dont see why that would matter. many feds dont use planes for official duties but maybe you're right. personally I didnt want to mention the fed thing which I have in my other posts/threads because of trolls like AH(however your post was before his so I figured I'd let you know since you said 'feds can no questions asked') his question had already been answered before he asked it
wc is fine but when trolls like AH show up its time to just close the thread. I dont need the fun of TFL turning into he said she said and faxing documents to please his mind. what do you do Sir? whats your profession? are you an LEO? you shouldnt be judegmental AH.
Last edited: