[OT] More fuel to the fire: Gay equality activists heading to Boy Scouts headquarters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trying to avoid the legal issues here for a moment, It would be totally INAPPROPRIATE for a gay man to take a group of young men & boys on a wilderness outing for the same reasons as it would be inappropriate for me to take a group of young ( 10-16 ) girls on such an outing, where privacy is minimal and even minor emergencies can reduce that to zero. This is true wven though I know that I intend absolutely nothing improper! just my $0.02
crankshaft
paranoia is a great thing to have when they actually are out to get You!!
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnochGale:
... When you can prove the existence of God then you might have a case ...[/quote]"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

This country was founded on a belief in God. The 2nd Amendment, which we so frequently fall back on as our right to keep & bear arms, is one of the 10 rights bestowed on mankind from his Creator (another name for God). Take God out of the picture and who gave us our right to keep & bare arms? Nobody! If nobody gave us these rights, then we really don't have them and they can therefore be taken away from us. Sounds very much like the logic used by the Anti's.

FUD
fudflag.gif
Share what you know & learn what you don't
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnochGale:
You offer nothing to the debate except Scripture. When you can prove the existence of God then you might have a case.[/quote]

And YOU have not told us how the government is funding the BSA.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Your faith cannot be the basis of denying people their rights.[/quote]

Rights are inseparately conected to responsibility. Homosexuals don't have the right to be in the BSA, because it is against the BSA code of ethics to allow them membership.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>As I first said, the basic posts are driven by motives not important to this group and degenerating into calls to the authority of Scripture to justify discrimination.[/quote]

Just as calls to the "authority" of civil rights justifies the trampling of rights. :rolleyes:

Truth is not negotiable.



------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!
www.cphv.com
 
hehe I am not even going to touch the Gay Rights aspect of this. I got enought Flame Mail from my last one but thankfully some people who just wanted to discuss facts and Ideas.

I think the big thing here is this question though. When does an Idividuals rights end and a privately owned organazations begin? THis is where I personally have troble. I believe everyone should have the right to be a part of something no no matter what they look like or who they want to sleep with. But At the same time the Boy Scouts does have rights as an Org. So where does one end and the other begin.

As I said earlier. I pulled my support for the Boy scouts of America when they did this. It was a personal choice because of my beliefs. Just like I will no longer buy a S&W or shop somewhere that is against my rights. There is a very fine line here and I haven't found out exactly where it is yet. :(
 
kevinw, I see you have been dragged into this by more of John/az2's flame-bait and Religious Reich trash. Try not to take it personally.

Juan Hunt Greer, Explain? You make an odd statement but yet offer no logical basis.
 
LAB, JAUN, Yeah!

Enoch, Who were you talking about proving existed??? Thats what I thought. ;)

Clinton can be the honorary leader, he aint gay.I think that has been fairly well established.

One thing I know for sure is that making Women wear shirts and not Men is discriminatory! :D Take em off ladies, I'm for equal rights.Based on Clintons look the other day so is he. :)

Where do I get some of those allocated funds for the advancement of White,Male,Hetro-sexual,Christian,GunOwning,Alcohol consuming, fur trappers. Didnt think so. BTW anyone got a match for my marlboro?

The liberals arent used to losing at the Supreme court, I think that is what is getting to them, wow, imagine if they were as vehement about gun rights as they are about their fear of anything religious? IMHO I believe they are trying to force their beliefs on others as has been said here before, they cant go with the tide they have to proclaim it and expect everyone to go along with it or else they yell intolerance or whatever the catch word of the day is. Didn't they come up with Zero Tolerance or was that Final Solution ? Not so fun on the other side is it?




[This message has been edited by oberkommando (edited August 23, 2000).]
 
As someone else noted: "They're here. They're queer. They're after your children."

------------------
ALARM! ALARM! CIVILIZATION IS IN PERIL! THE BARBARIANS HAVE TAKEN THE GATES!
 
Why want to join an organization that doesnt want you?

Why not start up your own similar organization with like minded people?

Why can't the protestors do this?
------------------
Try to take away my gun...and you will see my 2nd Amendment Right in ACTION!!! -Me

FOR THE CHILDREN!!!!

[This message has been edited by MrBigglesworth (edited August 23, 2000).]
 
I feel compelled to get my $.02 in before this gets closed since I started it.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from EnochGale:
Also, the Boy Scouts should stop accepting any government funding and endorsements.
[/quote]

Perhaps.. then the government should stop giving hand-outs to dozens of other groups that clearly do not need it as well. The entire problem with this.. is that a private organization is being told by the government that they have to accept people that do not agree with their standards or fit within their guidelines. Why would a gay man want to join the Boy Scouts when they clearly know that it is contrary to the beliefs of the Boy Scouts? I can recall (as a Boy Scout in the late 80's) many troops having trouble with gay Scout Masters who were intent on flaunting their "gayness" amongst the younger scouts. I realize that every group has a few bad apples.. but there was an exceptional amount of bad apples here..

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from Jeff Thomas
You and I have been around this subject before. In my opinion, the gay community is creating a needless backlash for themselves with this cause. People will not be forced to associate with gays in their private organizations (especially those with a religious component), and attempts to force otherwise will not help in assimilating gays into our society. This will create needless hatred.
[/quote]

Jeff, I couldn't agree with you more on this one.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from EnochGale
Show me how that influences your job performance.

And the churches that condemn gays, should take a hard look at themselves.
[/quote]

re: job performance
My roommate recently witnessed several fellow employees getting fired due to drug usage. Several guys he worked with (an electrician) smoked pot so heavily that you could smell it on them (and work vehicles) at any given time. After a few minor job-related accidents (from being high) they were cut loose. The company he worked for did not have a drug policy up to this point. Not to mention, that on the way to work they would stop and purchase more pot to smoke on their breaks...

re: churches
What have they got to examine themselves for? It is the individual at fault. Unlike everyone else in the world today, the churches (or majority of them) are not reinventing themselves to make gays feel special.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from FUD
I would say that churches who condemn gays have already taken a hard look at themselves and made the correct decision. It is clear to me that an overwhelming majority of society has drifted from what the Good Book says in way or another (myself included -- remember, he without sin, cast the first stone) & it is the role AND responsibility of churches to point out our failures.
[/quote]

Good buddy, I COULD NOT agree with you more on that one! *high five*

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from labgrade
Coupla parts of the First Amendment say: freedom of association & freedom of speech.

Bot Scouts get to associate with whomever they want & anybody don't like it gets to bitch.
[/quote]

How about another *high five* for labgrade.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from JerryM
----8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<----
[/quote]

Jerry, rather that quote all that, I think you and FUD put it best when you piped up about the decline of morals/values/etc in society today..

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from EnochGale
You offer nothing to the debate except Scripture. When you can prove the existence of God then you might have a case.
[/quote]

EnochGale, no one is asking you to believe in such things.. but proving that their is a God would defeat the purpose of faith. If it was proven that God did exist, how more likely are you to take it as a "fact" anyway?

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from Juan Hunt Greer
Trying to avoid the legal issues here for a moment, It would be totally INAPPROPRIATE for a gay man to take a group of young men & boys on a wilderness outing for the same reasons as it would be inappropriate for me to take a group of young ( 10-16 ) girls on such an outing, where privacy is minimal and even minor emergencies can reduce that to zero. This is true wven though I know that I intend absolutely nothing improper! just my $0.02
[/quote]

Exactly! Which makes me wonder why gay men aren't trying to get into the girl scouts.. hmm...

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from FUD
This country was founded on a belief in God. The 2nd Amendment, which we so frequently fall back on as our right to keep & bear arms, is one of the 10 rights bestowed on mankind from his Creator (another name for God). Take God out of the picture and who gave us our right to keep & bare arms? Nobody! If nobody gave us these rights, then we really don't have them and they can therefore be taken away from us. Sounds very much like the logic used by the Anti's.
[/quote]

Thats all I need to know. I find it amazing that for a country founded in the belief of God, that we are so willing to write God out of everything today. Forget being sensitive to people who do not believe in God. When you moved here (or born here), you inherited freedom. This freedom allows you just that, freedom. Disagree with the motive and ideals that this country was founded on... fine. But don't come in here and change it to fit your needs! Don't like it, move somewhere else!

Uh.. forgot my /rant tag on that one.. :D

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from Kevinw
I think the big thing here is this question though. When does an Idividuals rights end and a privately owned organazations begin? THis is where I personally have troble. I believe everyone should have the right to be a part of something no no matter what they look like or who they want to sleep with. But At the same time the Boy Scouts does have rights as an Org. So where does one end and the other begin.
[/quote]

Well its simple. BSA says NO GAY SCOUT LEADERS meaning they are not allowed. They are a private organization, so therefore they draw the rules. Don't draw the rules.. tough. Why an individual would want to attempt to be a part of something that wants nothing to do with them.. go figure. Buy like gun policies.. don't want anyone to know you're packin'? Well then hide the package..

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> from MrBigglesworth
Why want to join an organization that doesnt want you?
Why not start up your own similar organization with like minded people?

Why can't the protestors do this?
[/quote]

I suppose they don't have the gray matter to handle it. But now that I think about it.. I'm sure there wouldn't be a lot of parents that would want to send their chidlren to The Gay Boy Scouts of America. Think about it. Where are you going to find gay kids at that age with parents that are willing to send them to such a camp. Unless they had gay parents [rant]which I think is evil in the most haneous way[/rant]. Anyway...

------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!

oberkommando sez:
"We lost the first and third and now they are after the Second!(no pun intended)"
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FUD:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

This country was founded on a belief in God. The 2nd Amendment, which we so frequently fall back on as our right to keep & bear arms, is one of the 10 rights bestowed on mankind from his Creator (another name for God). Take God out of the picture and who gave us our right to keep & bare arms? Nobody! If nobody gave us these rights, then we really don't have them and they can therefore be taken away from us. Sounds very much like the logic used by the Anti's.
[/quote]

A historical footnote: The phrase "under God" was added to the Pledge of Allegience in the 1950's. This change was sponsored by Sen. Joe McCarthy, who felt that it would prevent godless Communists from reciting the Pledge without inviting charges of hypocrisy.
 
David, "under God" was added in 1954 by an act of Congress -- thanks for bringing that up. I should have mentioned it in my original post but it was rather late. It shows that less than half a century ago, the majority of people in this country (as represented by their elected officials) still felt that God was an important part of this country -- not just in the beginning when this country was founded.
 
Not one bit of evidence about my basic statement that there are no data that suggests gays are a risk to anyone based on their being gay.

FUD - statements are not proof. I can say
Zeus gave me the right to 'bare' arms.
So what.

Minsters used to quote the Bible to prove the righteousness of segregation and the Inquisition. So what.

Again a useless debate.

That's why when some homophobe posts about this issue and you all jump on the band wagon without anything to back you up - it is a waste of time. However, I comment so someone reading this list realizes that not all proponents of the RKBA are so antiquated and narrow minded in their beliefs.
 
I quote the following from the Bill of Rights which stands side-by-side to the Constitution of the United States and our governing framework:

Amendment 1
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom if speech, or if the press, or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

----------
I call you attention to the phrase, ". . . of of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, . . ." Back in the good 'ol days this was called the freedom of association. In other words, citizens of the US were free to associate with whomever they desire. Looks like we conveniently add "rights" when we want and delete what is objectionable.

This ain't a gay thing! This is an attack on the freedom of association. Let add this to the list of freedoms under attack.



------------------
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Barry Goldwater--1964
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnochGale:
That's why when some homophobe posts about this issue and you all jump on the band wagon without anything to back you up - it is a waste of time. However, I comment so someone reading this list realizes that not all proponents of the RKBA are so antiquated and narrow minded in their beliefs. [/quote]

Being that I originally posted this article, I surely hope you are not referring to me as a "homophobe." I'll ask that you take it easy.. this wasn't intended to turn into a flame-war, but you're working on it. :mad:
 
102K. And just in time...

Closed.

Debates such as this, though not strictly prohibited on TFL, obviously do nothing to further the cause of Responsible Firearms Ownership, nor do they aid in our fight retain/regain our right to Keep and Bear Arms.

Is a part 2 worth it?

------------------
RKBA!
"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security"
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 4
Concealed Carry is illegal in Ohio.
Ohioans for Concealed Carry Website
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top