You sound "confused", which is not surprisinbg, for unfortunately the subject of "gun control" generates more heat than light. You seem to be seeking information though, which is good. Legitimate academic research, of which there is quite a bit, supports the individual right to keep and bear arms, though the general circulation press, and "electronic journalists" do not mention it. See back issues of The Univ. of Tn. Law School Journal for instance, I believe it was the Spring 1997 issue. Generally, the anti-gunners utilize fear, ignorance, lies and half truths to support their side. One question one might is as follows: Looking at the results promised, as opposed to those actually attained, where has gun control, once enacted, performed as promised? Another is as follows: While they continually beat the drum for more gun laws, spelled restrictions on the law abiding, why is it that the Clinton admninistration has compiled so dismal a record respecting enforcement of existing law as it relates to firearms. The next time you get together with some who are pro gun control, try asking these questions. I believe that you might find the answers, if you get any "answers" very interesting. Finally, you have chosen, for the moment, not to own firearms. Nothing at all wrong with that, it is your decision to make. You also have freedom of speech, which would include criticizing the goverenment. Of course, you do not have to criticize, especially if you should be happy with what government is doing. Nobody should tell you that you cannot speak however, which is in effect, what the anti-gunners are doing. Think about it.
Regards, Alan