I don't think it is an issue of "normal" price, I think it is an issue of knowledge and intent. When the clerk doesn't get the right scan, or they ring up the wrong price, it is not intentional, they are not trying to be dishonest. If the clerk KNEW the price of a box of ammo was $9.00 and intentionally rang up $19.00, that would be dishonest. Same thing here. The friend KNEW the clerk had made a mistake and was charging the wrong price. And yes, I have pointed out to cashiers that they were undercharging for an item, just as I have pointed out when they are overcharging.Why is it when someone pays over "normal" retail it is buyer beware, but when someone buys something for under "normal" retail it is "stealing"?
Whoah whoah whoah..!
Did you just pay $15 for a box of 100round .45acp?
......... jealous!
FYI, where my daughter works, and at my Mother's previous empoyer, if something like that occurred the price difference comes out of the clerk's paycheck.
The cashier is supposed to be familiar with price trends, and if a scan shows something unusual and she doesn't check the price, yes, the cashier is held responsible at many stores. An honest mistake is not their fault, such as an item that scans 19.09 when it should be 19.99 and they don't notice a problem. But something that scans at .99 instead of 19.99 should be caught. Of course, policy differs from company to company. Even at that, I'd bet that if you sell a 42" LCD HD TV for $4.72 because that is what it scanned you'd be in trouble.So if someone else messed up programing the barcode scans, the cashier who rang it up is supposed to pay for it???