hogdogs said:
4 Years of Mccain is wayyyy better than 4 of Osama... I mean Obama or hitlery and their EVIL intentions to spend this nation into NWO servitude...
But with a Clinton to fight, Republicans in Congress seem less willing to spend. Dems in Congress seem ever-willing to spend.
Annual federal spending:
1992 $1,381.6 billion GHW Bush's last budget. 238 billion higher than his first
1993 1,409.5 Clinton's first budget
1994 1,461.9
1995 1,515.9
1996 1,560.6
1997 1,601.3
1998 1,652.7
1999 1,702.0
2000 1,789.2 Clinton's last, 380 billion higher than his first
2001 1,863.2 GW Bush's first
2002 2,011.2
2003 2,160.1
2004 2,293.0
2005 2,472.2
2006 2,655.4
2007 2,784.3
2008 2,901.9 (est) GW's last, a bit over a
trillion higher than his first.
Presidents don't spend us into NWO servitude, Congress does, and they seem to do it more when we have a Republican President. When Newt and the radicals took over, they "only" grew the government by 40 or 50 billion per year for a while.
As for me, I'll find or write someone on my ballot who supports actually reducing the size and scope of the federal government.