Since all laws are broken then based on your criteria we would be an anarchy.
Since you have misidentified my criteria tis obvious you missed my point. Moving on.....
I'm waiting for your try at the RFL. C'mon now, fair is fair.
Fair is fair. You've already got my "try" at improving the RFL.
It is, essentially due process, but I'll state it again, in simple terms...
IDENTIFY the person suspected of being a "dangerous nut".
Hold a hearing before a court, where both parties are present, and allowed to present evidence and challenge evidence/accusations against them.
Court ruling, based on evidence and arguments presented at the hearing.
Actions taken (or not taken) to implement the court's ruling.
IN THAT ORDER.
IF this is done, I can only see all possible outcomes falling into one of three possibilities.
The court can order the person incarcerated, the court can release them and order their guns taken, or the court can release them without ordering their guns taken.
While not 100% error free (nothing made by man is), the process is as fair as we can make it.