toybox99615
New member
precisely the action
taken to file agains a location that has already attempted to nullify the decision is appropriate. Where there has not been any action to nullify is becomes preemptive and without basis.
"I could not disagree more. If anything is evident it is that cities such as NY and Chicago do not roll back gun laws. If they really want to they can and doing so will end the case. That is not going to happen. They are going to fight and if we wait a day or a decade that is not going to change. "
As I previously indicated actions by the NRA must be planned and coordinated least we waste money on issues that do not exist.
taken to file agains a location that has already attempted to nullify the decision is appropriate. Where there has not been any action to nullify is becomes preemptive and without basis.
"I could not disagree more. If anything is evident it is that cities such as NY and Chicago do not roll back gun laws. If they really want to they can and doing so will end the case. That is not going to happen. They are going to fight and if we wait a day or a decade that is not going to change. "
As I previously indicated actions by the NRA must be planned and coordinated least we waste money on issues that do not exist.