As long as NRA members believe the NRA is doing a good job, they don't want to hear negative conversation
Don't know if I 100% agree with that assessment.
If a person has negative/logical/constructive criticism on most any topic, (and this is important) backed by documented facts, most people are willing to openly discuss about anything. That's how organizations learn from mistakes they make and become more effective.
On the other hand, to sit and ridicule without facts, I wouldn't expect many to just go along with that program.
On the political side, if the NRA doesn't endorse our favorite candidate, should we not believe in the NRA simply for that reason? Remembering, the NRA is in business to promote and has a long history of fighting for our 2nd Amendment rights....and yes, there have been political candidates in the past the NRA endorsed which didn't suit my fancy to a tee.
A couple things I get tired of with the NRA:
1. The monthly phone calls wanting the contributions. I just can't afford to give every time the phone rings. Course the NRA is no worse at this then the Veterans Administration or many other organizations operating on mostly donated money.
2. The great amount of junk- mail literature I'm sent.
IMO, take the money I contribute and better use it for fighting the anti's in Washington rather then sending me this literature....then there's the bombardment of e-mails.
These things I can deal with cause I feel what they(NRA) does for me as a gun owner, far out-weighs these couple of things.