JustDreadful
New member
Sure. This means nothing for NV residents. The problem is for non-residents who hold UT or FL permits, some of whom hold such permits specifically so they can carry in NV. Gabe Suarez, for example, has said he'll no longer hold classes in NV because of this (also not in and of itself the end of the world, of course, though I would like to take a Suarez class and would not like to drive Arizona's craptastic two-lane "highway" in order to do so). And how will this affect Vegas' ability to retain SHOT?
And the larger point that this is one more dumbass bureaucratic infringement on the right to carry, which will inconvenience law-abiding people to no purpose. Unless DPS can demonstrate that visitors with UT/FL permits were causing problems, all this amounts to is uselessly hassling people for the sake of hassling people. Alaska and Vermont have the only reasonable CCW systems.
To jfrey123, Florida was dropped because their permit is good for seven years, as opposed to NV's five. Those extra two years will result in slaughter that Pol Pot never dreamed of. Slaughter, I tell you!
And the larger point that this is one more dumbass bureaucratic infringement on the right to carry, which will inconvenience law-abiding people to no purpose. Unless DPS can demonstrate that visitors with UT/FL permits were causing problems, all this amounts to is uselessly hassling people for the sake of hassling people. Alaska and Vermont have the only reasonable CCW systems.
To jfrey123, Florida was dropped because their permit is good for seven years, as opposed to NV's five. Those extra two years will result in slaughter that Pol Pot never dreamed of. Slaughter, I tell you!
Last edited: