the backstop is not just foliage. its huge walls of tires, I don't know how tall, but very tall.
LOL skizzums. Yes, they had backstops and the extensively remodeled versions are in the picture I provided, but backstops don't stop rounds from going over the top of them, do they? Just because you have a backstop doesn't mean that is where the bullets are going. Besides, if you go into Google Earth and look at what the old dirt backstops looked like, you can see that they were much smaller than they are now. You can see extensive work on the berms since Oct 29, 2010
Also, What is the ground elevation of the shooter's tables, ground elevation of the shooter's tables, berms, and Caldwell house? According to Google Earth,...
Tables 1060 ft
25 yard berm 1058 ft
50 yard berm 1055 ft
100 yard berm 1046 ft
Caldwell home 1087 ft
So the berms are down slope from the shooting tables, the land falling away down to a drainage between the range and Caldwell house, but the Caldwell house was HIGHER than the shooting tables. At 100 yards, the berm would have to have 14 ft of elevation just to be LEVEL with the ground at the shooting tables, plus another 2.5 feet for the height of the shooting table. As ground level for the Caldwell house was 27 feet higher, the berm at 100 yards would need to be in the neighborhood of 30 ft tall just to be out of direct line of sight from the shooting tables. As can be seen in the after-suit images, they still are not that tall today.
http://advancedbullets.com/
im not saying tires are the best idea, just clarifying. I do know that the ne insurance company had them get an audit by the NRA and they cleared the range, I don't know what that means, but it must be worth something.
No, the COURT had them get inspected by the NRA.
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/couple-awarded-175k-lawsuit-over-stray-gun-range-b/nYT7p/
The range may have met NRA standards, but that doesn't mean rounds were not going over the berm, LOL. Once over, the only thing to stop the rounds is the foliage.
I also know they had no complaints until THOSE people moved in, and haven't had any more strays since they left
To quote you...
I know absolutely zero facts about the case,
Then you don't know if there were complaints before or not and it does not matter if there weren't. You just got the story the owner gave you. That the house is now rented by a range employee tells you something. You think the employee is going to complain out loud if there is a problem? You think the owner is going to tell you if there was a problem?
-------------------------------------------------
What exactly do you think a safe and legal range should do? Close down because people bought land around them and don't like the range?
The range is NOT safe and legal if rounds are leaving the property.