NJ Carry: Drake v. Filko (Muller v. Maenz)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would like to draw your attention to pg 51 of the PDF, Part B of the dissent.

One facet of New Jersey’s history of firearm regulation is particularly important to the longstandingness inquiry. Until 1966, New Jersey allowed the open carry of firearms without a permit. Only concealed carry without a permit issued upon a showing of need has been banned since 1924. This distinction is significant because courts have long distinguished between these two types of carry, holding that although a State may prohibit the open or concealed carry of firearms, it may not ban both because a complete prohibition on public carry violates the Second Amendment and analogous state constitutional provisions.
Click to expand...

This is significant as Judge Hardiman has just stated what Alan Gura has been arguing from the first carry case filed after McDonald. The dissent doesn't just stop there. Judge Hardiman next lays out the cases that the Court in Heller cited with favor, and tells the majority why those cases were cited. Judge Hardiman then ends that portion of his dissent with:

The crux of these historical precedents, endorsed by the Supreme Court, is that a prohibition against both open and concealed carry without a permit is different in kind, not merely in degree, from a prohibition covering only one type of carry. After all, if a State prohibits only one type of carry without a permit, an opportunity for the free exercise of Second Amendment rights still exists. That opportunity disappears when the prohibition is extended to both forms of carry.

The same logic applies to the 1966 New Jersey law. Prior to that year, New Jersey prohibited only concealed carry without a permit. Accordingly, individuals were able to exercise their Second Amendment rights without first obtaining permission from the State. By enacting a prohibition on open carry without a permit in the 1966 law, New Jersey eliminated that right.

Thus, when the majority identifies 1924 as the operative date for its longstandingness inquiry, it does so in derogation of historical precedents, cited approvingly by the Supreme Court in Heller, that draw an important distinction between concealed and open carry. Under these precedents, when New Jersey eliminated the ability of its residents to openly carry arms without a permit in 1966, it was, as a constitutional matter, enacting an entirely new law.
Click to expand...

Having destroyed the Majorities "Long Standing" argument, Judge Hardiman goes on to destroy their reliance upon the Kachalsky case, that was just as rife with error as the Majority is here.

There are many more things in that dissent that can be drawn upon in requesting a hearing en banc.

What we should look for, is that the request is granted and that Hardiman's dissent carries the day. That would force the State to petition the SCOTUS for cert, which would almost guarantee a grant (the Supreme Court is more likely to grant cert to a State whose law has been struck down).
 
3rd Circuit en banc upheld the "right" of middle schoolers to wear bracelets reading,"I (heart) boobies!" Does that give us any hope! The school district had to prove that the bracelets would cause a disruption, but apparently NJ using 40 year old cooked stats by Zimring and "blood in the streets" is good enough for some of the 3rd circuit at least.

http://pennrecord.com/news/10971-th...-students-in-i-heart-boobies-free-speech-case

I think Gura has 2 weeks or so to request en banc?
 
Last edited:
Interesting that the en banc procedures will actually eliminate the majority in this case(Aldisert is senior status, Stark is a District judge).

Composition of En Banc Quorum
For purposes of determining the majority number necessary to grant a petition for rehearing,
all circuit judges currently in regular active service who are not disqualified will be counted.

Odds are still stacked against us though.
 
I'd hope they don't wait that long to file and risk going into next term.
They can probably wait until Woollard's fate is known and file for cert at that time, likely early October if my estimate is correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top