Carl the Floor Walker
Moderator
This thread has identified, to me, a couple issues.
First the gun is not a practical contender to other .380 options out there. I can buy a .380 that is lighter, smaller, AND has less perceived recoil. If I want roughly the same size and weight I can get a lot less perceived recoil.
Setting the sights differently to save money harms the nostalgia of the product. With the price tag on these compared to more functional options this is a luxury purchase - don't go cheap on production of a luxury item. These are, traditionally, a beautiful gun (though I think the Sigs looked better) and a pleasure to own. They are not, however, practical when compared to other options
As noted above I also think this would be better chambered in .32. More nostalgia and still an interesting range piece though I can understand the argument for the .380
Ok, so what is the recoil rating? The older model is a measly 2.68 ftlbs compared to say a Ruger LCP at around 5.89 or even the Keltec 32.cal at 3. 54.
I mean this is not a 9mm. It weighs 22 oz. If you cannot handle that then, well can't help ya.
Folks looking for a larger, 380 and a DA/SA this might be right up their alley. The Bersa has done very well over the years. I can see how this will be a very good seller. Not for me, but there are many folks at love the larger 380 Pistols. Bravo to Walther!!! And why in the world, would you want this in a 32.cal?
Last edited: