This thread has identified, to me, a couple issues.
First the gun is not a practical contender to other .380 options out there. I can buy a .380 that is lighter, smaller, AND has less perceived recoil. If I want roughly the same size and weight I can get a lot less perceived recoil.
Setting the sights differently to save money harms the nostalgia of the product. With the price tag on these compared to more functional options this is a luxury purchase - don't go cheap on production of a luxury item. These are, traditionally, a beautiful gun (though I think the Sigs looked better) and a pleasure to own. They are not, however, practical when compared to other options
As noted above I also think this would be better chambered in .32. More nostalgia and still an interesting range piece though I can understand the argument for the .380