but don't be surprised if you get charged. I am not in agreement with any of this but at the same time, don't want to be a test case.
I strongly suggest you contact the NJSP and ask them to clear up this confusion for you....
but don't be surprised if you get charged. I am not in agreement with any of this but at the same time, don't want to be a test case.
Not quite; to clarify this, they're legal for home defense, but not for carry outside the home. You may use them for target practice and for hunting (when otherwise legal), and you may transport them between your home and wherever you're doing those things, but it's illegal to possess them elsewhere.diamondd817 said:Hollowpoints are legal to posses and use at the range and for SD in NJ.
Not quite; to clarify this, they're legal for home defense, but not for carry outside the home.
I'm aware of of that, but others reading this may not be. In standard usage, SD refers to self-defense anywhere, in the home or out, while HD is used to refer specifically to defense inside one's home. It's not a trivial distinction -- see the sticky on "Duty to Retreat..." etc. at the top of the L&CR index page. And it's by no means a moot point that is illegal to possess them elsewhere than the specified locations or travel routes, so that even having them in your car while you detour to go to the supermarket would be grounds for arrest.But, you have to realize a NJ carry permit is unatainable. So, to mention that they are illegal for carry outside the home is a mute [sic] point.
I really don't appreciate the personal attacks I have gotten here. I relayed what the NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE are telling gunshops and I am getting nasty messages and arguments. I AM NOT THE PERSON saying this, I am relaying what the NJSP has told us. I am done, will not discuss this further. Do what you want. I really don't care at this point.
He was probably referring to my post, which was a bit out of line. I just get frustrated with the bad information a lot of gun dealers pass out in this state.
No, he was referring to those posters who pointed out that he was incorrect in saying that the detachable vertical foregrip shown on one of the two ARs in the photographs in this thread was a prohibited (i.e. "evil") feature.NJgunowner said:He was probably referring to my post, which was a bit out of line.