New AMP Annealer

You're making the whole process a great deal more complicated than it is. Annealing and trimming, for instance, are not something you need to do every time. You don't need to clean the cases twice either.
Trimming is only done when the cases get longer than the max case length. Annealing(that has nothing whatever to do with resizing) is only done when you get one cracked case.

The first part is right.

The second part is wrong.

That said, I simply resize every 5 rounds whether or not I have a too long a case.

Rather than measure every case, more better to do on a schedule. Cases stretch is random.

Same with annealing, once every 5 rounds.

Bench rest shooters (some) anneal every round each time.

Annealing needs to be done BEFORE you crack a case, otherwise you have cases that will never recover as they are gone, just not indicated.
 
The Lyman M die is a good choice, or you can get a Sinclair die body that holds outside neck turning mandrels and do it with one of those.

My brother got me into the M die and I love it. I just need to find a place for the second press to set it up full time!

I find zero need for lube on bullets with it, by feel they are very uniform.

I wound up with no expander for reasons we won't get into and did ok.

I hate those inside the neck expanders, case wreckers I think is a better term.
 
With a AMP annealing 50 cases is a matter of a few minutes and idiot proof, not like the old days of the torch and socket. I say if you got it use it but then I am one OCD guy when it comes to my loads. I anneal every load, takes me maybe 15 - 20 minutes to set it up and anneal 50 cases using a modded Anealeeze . That is just a guess, I have never timed it

When I get a new batch of cases in I trim then to SAAMI specs minus .020. For a .260 Rem that would be 2.015. After every range trip before I do my primer seating I do a measurement of the cases and if the case has grown by more than .002 I trim it back to 2.015.

Of course now after Uncle Nicks last post I am having to rethink my position on primer pockets. Like I said I am one OCD kinda guy and need my SD's as low as possible for my style shooting.
 
I am buying one of these annealers with my next, part-time job paycheck.

I have been planning this for weeks. I saw the review on The 6.5 Guys YouTube channel.
 
I am still partial to the Annie, but I think the AMP will do fine. Cost wise the Annie worked for me as well.

One aspect I have found in regards to the Annie, as its open, I can test with a Tempilstick Crayon.

We have found the paint on Tempil has metal and gives wrong results.

I would shoot for a setting that is not spot on but 750 or so and give a bit of latitude to the variables.
 
The Amp is the Cadillac of case annealing machines for sure. It is supposed to give the perfect anneal. With my budget I will settle for getting consistent and convenient anneals.
 
One reason I went with the AMP is because I now reload inside the house. I use to use my shed but thieves broke in and stole my scales. That's all they took. So now I'm inside and open flame is a no no. It takes very little time to anneal 50 cases. They are also promising an auto loader for about $300. I'm not interested in the loader because I have plenty of time on my hands. I also only work with two cartridges. I am also in a small room and the AMP unit is fairly small. I also have a little crow trimmer and it is very accurate and quick. I know there are places where I could shorten my reloading process. I choose not to short cut it.

Right now I'm trying to see the difference changes make. I'll start with the bolt guns and move to the semis.
 
Annealing is just one facet of case preparation. Along with other techniques it can lower the SD of your velocities. Unless you are shooting at medium to long range ( 300 +) with a .5 or less rifle or you are a benchrest shooter who already shoots .25 or less 5 shot groups already at 100 - 200 you won't see much if any difference

A good article on real world results from lowering the SD can be found here

http://precisionrifleblog.com/2015/04/18/how-much-does-sd-matter/

In these scenarios, there is a big 5% difference from 20 fps to 15 fps, but only 2.9% improvement from 15 fps to 10 fps, and then just a 1% improvement in hit percentage going from an SD of 10 fps to 3 fps! This is primarily because, once again, most misses at long range are caused by wind and not vertical dispersion. Bryan Litz says “If you’re missing the target for reasons unrelated to vertical dispersion, then reducing vertical dispersion won’t improve hit percentage very much.”
 
Last edited:
RC20,

I'm curious why the paint and stick results would be any different? In the past I actually filed some dust off the stick and mixed it with alcohol to apply it in order not to have to pre-warm the case to get a smooth application. Seemed to work fine, too.

If you feel unsure about the liquids, you can bracket them with several temperatures at a time. See which ones melt simultaneously with the stick you like.


jugornot said:
I use the Sinclair hand priming tool which I feel the primer bottoming.

I have one of these, too, but since feeling the primer just kiss the bottom of the primer pocket does not set the bridge, as described in the article, I probably am using it a bit differently than you do. Setting the bridge means finding where the primer just bottoms out, then forcing it in approximately another 0.003" deeper. In the 70's, Remington and Olin recommended anywhere from 0.002"-0.006" reconsolidation beyond touch-down, but Naval Ordnance at Indian Head did more detailed testing and and a decade later found 0.002-0.004" was optimal for reliability and consistency of ignition on both large and small primers. Federal recommends 0.002" for their small primers and 0.003" for their large primers, but given that you usually have a couple thousandths of primer pocket depth variation (unless you uniform them) and primer anvil height variation, 0.003" is easier to achieve. The only direct way I know to hit a target exactly is with the K&M Primer Gauge tool, which zeros a dial indicator on the bottom of a primer pocket while simultaneously subtracting the height of the primer you choose to insert, all prior to actual seating. And then when you seat that primer in that pocket, the indicator is at zero when the anvil kisses the bottom of the pocket and you can read the additional consolidation on the indicator directly as you press the lever.

With the Sinclair tool, I use an entirely different approach. I either uniform the primer pocket depths or measure and sort them. I gently do the same with primer height. I then subtract the primer height from the pocket depth and add 0.003" to the result. I use shim washers between the Sinclair tool's body and the case clamping collar to set the protrusion of the primer ram protrusion to match that resultant number. I then prime by pushing the handle all the way to reach that depth setting. As Dan Hackett reported in '95, you can get your velocity SD's down this way.

jugornot said:
I read the article but do not lube after the SS media tumble which is right before priming.

You can try it pretty easily. I have not done a long-term study on it, but if you run a brush into the case mouth to slight scuff the surface, then apply the graphite and alcohol and let it dry, you create a layer of graphite between the bullet and the neck that should prevent most of the cold bonding that causes bullet pull to increase with the age of the cartridge. This is believed to be due to random quantum behavior of the valence electrons in the copper atoms becoming confused about whether they belong to an atom on the gilding metal surface or one on the brass surface over time, producing a substantial bond between the alloys. Board member Hummer70 has described measuring bullet pull on 7.62 ammo during his time at Aberdeen Proving Grounds that reached up to 600 lbs due to this phenomenon (60 lbs is the new ammo spec). But the bullet and case atoms have to make intimate contact for that to happen (something being shiny smooth encourages), so anything that prevents direct contact between the copper alloys mitigates the effect. Same with using coated bullets.

BTW, I found in the past that if you look closely (magnifier) at the case mouths of some commercial ammo, you can find copper scraped off the bullet in a little ring at the case mouth. This is due to the edges of the case mouth being sharp. The same happens with a freshly chamfered case. Despite the angle, the the corner it makes with the ID of the rest of the neck frequently has a wire edge burr and scrapes bullets and coatings. I found I could take a freshly chamfered case and insert and then pull a moly-coated bullet, and the pulled bullet would have no visible moly below the case mouth line. I also found burnishing the chamfer eliminated the problem. Bart Bobbit was familiar with this and suggested using an E-Z Out screw extractor in a drill for this. It has a left-hand conically tapered coarse "thread" pattern for extracting stuck screws. I polished one up that covers .22-45 cal case mouths. After trimming and chamfering, brief contact with it burnishes the sharp edge off. However, a little additional time in the SS pin tumbler after sizing and trimming and chamfering will do the same thing for you and allow coated bullets to keep their coatings.
 
After trimming and deburring, I have noticed the tumbling does indeed polish the edges and allow easier seating without shaving the bullet. I will probably try my spray on case lube on my next series of reloading.

Stupid me I lost my large primer stem for my sinclair primer tool, and have ordered a Frankford Aresenal tool that has an adjustable seating depth built in. I look forward to trying this tool when it arrives. The measuring primer depth and subtracting primer height has me confused. I suppose you could only measure on the outside of the cup because the height in the center is affected by the anvil. I also look forward to moving to my lapua brass which is palma brass. I should have my first test tomorrow for ES on annealed brass. Need to build bullets and shoot.

Thanks again to everyone. The deeper I get into this subject the deeper it gets. Thanks.
 
Interesting info on the primer seating. After reading this thread I went back and checked a bunch of cases that I had just primed and with the help of a dial indicator and a hastily rigged jig I found that indeed the primers were not uniformly seated. I put the priming arm on the press and went back and reseated them using "moderate" force. On rechecking they are all at least seated at a uniform depth. If it is like most aspects of shooting the key would be consistency. These cases are too be used in a load test of a new powder possibly on Thursday so I will take the chrono and see how my SD's look. Anything that may eliminate a flyer is a good thing

I guess sooner or later I may end up with one of these

http://www.xxicsi.com/stainless-steel-priming-tool.html

edit - that was also a interesting idea on the burnishing. Using the chamfer tool in a cordless drill ran counterclockwise seemed to do a decent job. I bet a countersink likewise ran backwards would also probably work
 
Last edited:
You might also look here:
https://www.sinclairintl.com/reloadi...prod37732.aspx

I ended up with:
https://www.midwayusa.com/product/58...d-priming-tool

The latter does not have as tight of tolerances, but good feel. It is also tray fed. So far I rate it good for the price.

yeah I looked at both of those and may consider one or the other if I ever feel the need to step it up. I randomly checked 5 cases that where I reseated the primers using the press and all were within .001 of each other. I guess I will be using the press to double seat my primers, at least on my match and load testing ammo now

At the moment I have my SD under control and to the point I wanted it to be. Just as the article I linked earlier pointed out that lowering the SD has a diminishing return. I have hit that diminishing returns point now and my toy money is best spent on bullets, powder, primers and practice more practice and even more practice and maybe a new stock for Christmas

Please keep posting on your quest for low SD's, I enjoy these diuscussions and always seem to pick something up from the thread. It took me a couple of months of small changes for me to start hitting single and low double digits on my rounds and the best advice I can offer is try and make every round just like every other round in every aspect from the primer to the bullet
 
Last edited:
Jugornot,

The primer height I am referring to is from the bottom of the cup to the tops of the anvil feet. The feet are what touch the bottom of the primer pocket and the anvil tip needs to be forced 0.003" deeper into the priming mix during seating. You measure primer height gently so you don't accidentally get a bad measurement by starting to compress the anvil into the cup.

Consolidation (assembly into a unit) of the cup, mixture, foil, and anvil happens at the primer factory. Reconsolidation is that additional 0.003" of compression of the anvil into the foil and mixture. It optimizes sensitivity and consistency of the mixture combustion by pre-loading any cushioning by the foil (actually made of paper these days; the old cap and ball percussion caps used actual metal foil as a moisture seal and retaining cover) and uniforming the amount of priming mix filling the gap between the inside bottom of the primer cup and the tip of the anvil, which also affects cushioning of the firing pin.
 
Good News and then what the heck:
Series Shot Speed
9 1 2886 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 10 Shots: 5
Min 2868 Max 2886
Avg 2876 S-D 7.6
ES 18

Series Shot Speed
10 1 2876 ft/s Group Size O-t-O C-t-C
10 2 2868 ft/s 0.98 0.68
10 3 2881 ft/s
10 4 2886 ft/s
10 5 2869 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 11 Shots: 5
Min 2880 Max 2897
Avg 2884.6 S-D 7.1
ES 17

Series Shot Speed
11 1 2881 ft/s Group Size O-t-O C-t-C
11 2 2881 ft/s 0.82 0.52
11 3 2880 ft/s
11 4 2897 ft/s
11 5 2884 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 12 Shots: 5
Min 2855 Max 2904
Avg 2880.6 S-D 21.0
ES 49

Series Shot Speed
12 6 2900 ft/s Group Size O-t-O C-t-C
12 7 2855 ft/s 0.71 0.41
12 8 2904 ft/s
12 9 2868 ft/s
12 10 2876 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
First 2 groups were improvement on a good scale. The last was a disappointment. The only thing I did differently from normal was the primer seating. Because I did not have my new priming tool yet, I seated these primers on my press. It was the first time I had ever used the press for this purpose. I will conduct another test probably this weekend or next week. A cold has kept me from other chores for the past few days. I mention the primer difference because I was amazed at the difference in pressure required for the press. I know it is mechanical advantage that makes the hand seaters feel easier, but I had to reseat several of the primers because they were not level. Next test will rule primers out to some extent. Still working on a measurement for primers below head.
 
Keep a running average of the SD's. Just as one 5 shot group does not make or break a 5 shot SD can go to extremes also. Right now you have a running average of 12. That is below factory which averages 15 FPS deviations. I kept a spreadsheet going for a couple of months and still log the results when I am shooting from the bench and have a chrono set up
 
on the primer seating. I am not sure if it was the double seating of the primers, the new powder I was testing, or the neck lube or all three but I did a load test yesterday and three of four sets I chrono'ed were several FPS lower than normal. Not sure what happened at 44.0 gr

Name: Nosler Range Test
Notes: Powder test


44.1gr


Shots: 5
Average: 2731 FPS
SD: 8 FPS
Min: 2721 FPS
Max: 2743 FPS
Spread: 22 FPS
Barometric Pressure: 30
Temperature: 50
--------------------------
Name: Nosler Range Test
Notes: Powder test


44.5 gr


Shots: 5
Average: 2728 FPS
SD: 4 FPS
Min: 2726 FPS
Max: 2737 FPS
Spread: 11 FPS
Barometric Pressure: 30
Temperature: 50
--------------------------
Name: Nosler Range Test
Notes: Powder test


44.3 gr


Shots: 5
Average: 2739 FPS
SD: 10 FPS
Min: 2721 FPS
Max: 2749 FPS
Spread: 28 FPS
Barometric Pressure: 30
Temperature: 50
--------------------------
Name: Nosler Range Test
Notes: Powder test


44.1 gr


Shots: 5
Average: 2730 FPS
SD: 7 FPS
Min: 2726 FPS
Max: 2743 FPS
Spread: 17 FPS
Barometric Pressure: 30
Temperature: 50
--------------------------
Name: Nosler Range Test
Notes: Powder test


44.0 gr


Shots: 5
Average: 2681 FPS
SD: 43 FPS
Min: 2609 FPS
Max: 2721 FPS
Spread: 112 FPS
Barometric Pressure: 30
Temperature: 50
--------------------------
 
I went to the range yesterday. I was trying some load development for my bolt gun using my 308 palma brass. I did two 10 shot ladders with 175 and 168 smk. It was during the loading of these that I became frustrated with my scales. I have a Lyman gen 5 auto dispenser, a Lyman 1500 electronic scale and a smartweigh cheapo .02 grain scale. Some background info. I was an apprenticed instrument tech/electrician. I later was an instrument tech. All of this over a 40 year career. I have calibrated scales from 10,000 lbs to tenths of a gram. All this said I know when a scale has problems. The most reliable of my 3 scales is the Lyman 1500. The gen 5 is consistently .1 or .2 grains low. this is ok because I would trickle to a final weight. But I was trying for better accuracy with the smartweight. This is a replacement for a Gempro 250 which was stolen along with my first gen 5. Any way a new A&D FX120i is on its way with an auto trickler. I am lerning the old adage buy once cry once time and time again. The cheap .02 grain scales vary up to .2 tenths when zeroing the pan.

I know this was originally about my annealer, but it is morphing into a precision reloading thread. Anyway thanks for all the help and any more is welcome. Thanks again guys.
 
getting back to annealing for a minute.

I am a huge fan of Bryan Litz and own a couple of his books but do not own Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting Vol. 2. Apparently he did some annealing tests in this volume and came to the conclusion that annealing has no benefit on group sizes.

I myself have seen tremendous improvements in my SD's over the last few months along with fewer and fewer flyers. Pretty much the ones I do see are due to operator error and generally called before I see them. I see shooters obsess over neck bushings, trimming, and even turning necks to get what they feel to be the proper neck tension. It baffles me why the condition of the metal would have no benefit since obviously it does affect the springback of the necks. Granted I have also been working on getting more precise with the neck trimming, and other preparations as well as my range techniques at the same time so the annealing every firing may not be as necessary as I think.

I am saving my shooting money right now for a new stock and scope or I would buy the book just to read that one chapter. I would love to find out what method he was using and how often. If any here have the book and would like to educate us on the method used and how frequently along with the results it would be appreciated. Regardless with my current equipment it is a pretty easy operation and as I am fond of saying "if it works for you then don't change it without a good reason " so I will most likely continue to anneal after every firing.
 
Last edited:
Went to the range yesterday. Trying to roll all my techniques into a ladder process. It includes annealed brass and seating primers to .003 crush. The brass is no longer a problem as it resizes and trims like new. The new scale is much better than either the Myweigh or Smartweigh scales. The autotrickler works great. So many things coming into focus and I received some of the lowest SD and ES ever. So here's the data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Min 2782 Max 2818
Avg 2800 S-D 18
ES 36

Series Shot Speed
1 1 2802 ft/s
1 2 2782 ft/s
1 3 2818 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 2 Shots: 3
Min 2809 Max 2814
Avg 2811 S-D 2.6
ES 5

Series Shot Speed
2 1 2814 ft/s
2 2 2809 ft/s
2 3 2810 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 3 Shots: 3
Min 2811 Max 2815
Avg 2813 S-D 2
ES 4

Series Shot Speed
3 1 2814 ft/s
3 2 2815 ft/s
3 3 2811 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 4 Shots: 3
Min 2815 Max 2837
Avg 2824 S-D 11.5
ES 22

Series Shot Speed
4 1 2820 ft/s
4 2 2837 ft/s
4 3 2815 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 5 Shots: 3
Min 2811 Max 2844
Avg 2826 S-D 16.6
ES 33

Series Shot Speed
5 1 2844 ft/s
5 2 2824 ft/s
5 3 2811 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 6 Shots: 3
Min 2845 Max 2858
Avg 2851 S-D 6.5
ES 13

Series Shot Speed
6 1 2850 ft/s
6 2 2858 ft/s
6 3 2845 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 7 Shots: 3
Min 2842 Max 2869
Avg 2855 S-D 13.5
ES 27

Series Shot Speed
7 1 2869 ft/s
7 2 2842 ft/s
7 3 2854 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----
Series 8 Shots: 3
Min 2853 Max 2863
Avg 2859 S-D 5.2
ES 10

Series Shot Speed
8 1 2863 ft/s
8 2 2861 ft/s
8 3 2853 ft/s
---- ---- ---- ----


average Shot 1 Shot 2 Shot 3
2800 45 2800 2802 2782 2818
2811 45.2 2811 2814 2809 2810
2813 45.4 2813 2814 2815 2811
2824 45.6 2824 2820 2837 2815
2826 45.8 2826 2844 2824 2811
2851 46 2851 2850 2858 2845
2855 46.2 2855 2869 2842 2854
2859 46.4 2859 2863 2861 2853

From the graph I attached, if I would pursue a load I would load 10 or 15 at 45.2, 45.3, and 45.4. Thanks to all who replied, especially Hounddawg and Unclenick. I know they are only 3 shot groups, but they are the lowest spreads and deviation I have ever shot.
 

Attachments

  • ladder.jpg
    ladder.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 14
Back
Top