oneounceload
Moderator
While salt rubbed into a would can burn and be painful, rock salt fired from a shotgun tends to vaporize rather quickly upon exiting the barrels and would NOT
be a viable choice.
While many jurisdictions, (including mine), allow for Castle Doctrine defense including the use of deadly force, the use of non-lethal force with a firearm can get you in trouble. The argument tends to go along the lines of, "if you didn't need to kill him ti save your life, you weren't justified in using a deadly weapon".
IF you must shoot someone, the adage is to shoot to kill. While modern forensics will eliminate the old "only one side of the story then", it is a choice to make when confronted with imminent threat of death or major harm
YMMV
be a viable choice.
While many jurisdictions, (including mine), allow for Castle Doctrine defense including the use of deadly force, the use of non-lethal force with a firearm can get you in trouble. The argument tends to go along the lines of, "if you didn't need to kill him ti save your life, you weren't justified in using a deadly weapon".
IF you must shoot someone, the adage is to shoot to kill. While modern forensics will eliminate the old "only one side of the story then", it is a choice to make when confronted with imminent threat of death or major harm
YMMV