Need reliable and durable .22 for ultra concealment

Red Bull, Do you REALLY have to have a .22? If you could have a .32 acp in the same size would you take it instead? I'd HIGHLY reccomend the Kel-Tec P32. It weighs 6.6oz+ammo, and it's a little dream for those of us who can't carry our .45's to work.

------------------
Frontsight!
=========================
"Put a rifle in the hands of a Subject, and he immediately becomes a Citizen." -- Jeff Cooper
 
With 1000 rounds of 32ACP and a Kel-Tec P-32, you would be set for a l o n g time. Plus you get MUCH more stopping power. This little thing is easy to hide. One other disadvantage with 22's, they are about the dirtest shooting there is, IMHO.
 
Use a revolver - no extra evidence (ejected brass) to worry about. +, no rack 'em in case of malfunctions = just pull the trigger again. The Liberty M317 (formerly know as S&W) is a beaut.

In fact, you can cut that down to zero left evidence with a piece of re-bar.

The mind's the weapon. Never forget it.
 
Revolver:

Fixed sights - S&W Model 317LS (wood grips)at 9.9 ounces, 8 rounds, lanyard pin, 1&7/8s barrel.

Adjustable Sights - Model 317 Kit Gun. 3 inch barrel, 8 rounds. I'd get wood grips for it (not as sticky and shave about 1/2 ounce off the weight).

Nothing against the NAA mini gun - but I'd sacrifice a bit on the size in order to have 8 fast shots rather than 5 slow shots.

Auto:

Double action capacity - Walther PPK/s.
Single action only: Beretta Model 70s (if you can find one).

Both have 8 round magazines.

The Beretta should be considerably less costly and has adjustable sights. Both are about the same size and are not quite as petite as the little Beretta 21 - but they seem to work better.


------------------
Jim Fox

[This message has been edited by JimFox (edited May 22, 2000).]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top