kind of conclusory aren't you? Many people say they won't go to certain states because they can't carry there. It is a perfectly legitimate legislative function to find that uniform carry laws facilitate travel and commerce involving travel. Because you can't see, or simply don't want to admit to it, is not a legitimate reason to overrule the legislature on this issue.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
nationwide concealed carry permit
- Thread starter DMMikey
- Start date
kind of conclusory aren't you? Many people say they won't go to certain states because they can't carry there. It is a perfectly legitimate legislative function to find that uniform carry laws facilitate travel and commerce involving travel. Because you can't see, or simply don't want to admit to it, is not a legitimate reason to overrule the legislature on this issue.
I certainly feel less safe travelling to CA since my NV permit is not honored there. I'm trying to get the wife to plan trips to places other than CA, due to this fact. Unfortunately with Gas as high as it is, this is harder to do. I'm looking forward to the day when reciprocity is offered for NV permits in CO, NM, and WY. Hopefully that will happen someday.
kind of conclusory aren't you? Many people say they won't go to certain states because they can't carry there. It is a perfectly legitimate legislative function to find that uniform carry laws facilitate travel and commerce involving travel. Because you can't see, or simply don't want to admit to it, is not a legitimate reason to overrule the legislature on this issue.
No, not at all. Because people say that they won't go to certian states because they cant carry there DOES NOT bring ccw within the purview of the commerce clause.
Again you are comitting the fatal error of saying that because it can be carried with someone across state lines, its within interstate commerce. That is not at all what the commerce clause was designed to regulate. Read the legislative history. Read the early judicial decisions. Read the notes of the framers. Its just not there.
And again, carrying a gun in no way facilitates commerce. It just doesn't. Unless killing someone or defending yourself is a part of commerce, you have no argument.
Again, your gunnykins are not the only important part of the constitution.